4,077 karma · joined January 8, 2014
Try for example to persuade GPT to argue that the workers doing data labeling in Kenya should be better compensated relative to the programmers in SF, as the work they do is both critical for good data for training and often very gruesome, with many workers getting PTSD from all the horrible content they filter out.
I couldn't, about a year ago. The model always tried to argue in favor of the status quo because of market forces - which is, of course, axiomatic ideology.
https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US43...
If the project is a startup, then the cost of labor is not zero, at least not if people are not deluding themselves (i.e. at least opportunity costs should be considered).
Personally, as a consumer, I'm pretty happy that I can buy e.g. a wireless mouse or a bluetooth speaker and can reasonably assume that they actually work and aren't accidently jammed by some "startup"'s hardware.
Nope, unarchiving tarballs doesn't write the tarball content to /tmp.
> It smacks of people with desktops, with enormous amounts of free RAM, making decisions for servers.
* Servers usually have way more RAM than desktop devices? Unless you mean VMs, in which case the VM can't decide what device /tmp lies in anyway.
* in any case it will be trivial to just not use it for your servers, if you prefer /tmp to be on disk. Just like I already used tmpfs for 2 decades in Debian, it is a single line in /etc/fstab either way.
Rape rate is about 3x the rate of EU: https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/crime_stats_oecdjan...
People killed by police (population adjusted) is about 30x the rate of Germany: https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-de... https://polizeischuesse.cilip.de/?p=1&year=2023
A scenario where people in creative jobs are essentially dispossessed with tax-avoiding megacorporations being the only profiteers is not the only possible option.
We as society could also decide that e.g. there have to be free occupational retraining options for those affected (as happened in other instances of technological revolutions), and AI models, or their underlying data, have to be open source of some new kind and so on.
By contrast Jeff's Avernum series was such a breath of fresh air. Really interesting world, great writing, no D&D. Those were really great. I wouldn't mind better graphics, but that's a minor point for me.
I am on X though, perhaps a Wayland related bug or config thing?
You can easily have a situation were production shrinks but productivity is unchanged, e.g. because a cohort leaves the workforce and becomes pensioneers.
An anectode from an Amartya Sen book: Uneducated women in rural India, when asked anout their health status, effectively said everything is fine. After getting access to better healthcare and health education, self reported health scores went down. Classic case of unknown unknowns: The women didn't know that live actually could be better than what they experienced so far.
The same is true for this discussion: I'd wager that thanks to Hollywood and world news coverage, the average citizen of a small EU country like Norway has (or at least thinks they have) deeper knowledge of live in the US than the average US person about live in Norway. So the Norwegian, when asked about their own happiness, can position themselves in context of this knowledge.
* Wealth includes house ownership, but in many EU countries living in a rented apartment is normal and even preferred, mostly because strong regulatory protection of tenant's rights. As an example our family could easily afford owning a house in the suburbs but still lives for rent in the city, because quality of life is better here.
* In the US, wealth includes savings for pension, whereas in many EU countries pensions are organized collectively, like an insurance. In other words most EU pension schemes are not visible in wealth statistics.
* Same for healthcare. I know of noone in my social circle saving for eventual healthcare crises because that is cared for by health insurance.
Very cool approach, though it will most probably only work for classification (i.e. what is this sample), whereas NIR spectroscopy (most common when working with organic compounds) allows for quantification of the sample analytes (who much of each analyte is in this sample).
IMO there's quite a bit to criticize in that approach, but calling it postmodernist relativism doesn't really fit.
https://www.minneapolisfed.org/about-us/monetary-policy/infl...
This is also the way our language perception generally works: The word is just the signifier, a variable. The meaning, the significate, is not inherent in the word itself.
If enough people say "gimp" and mean the software, that becomes the default inference.