bobro

what are the consequences of what youre saying? is it better if these scams mostly affect stupid people? should we care less about whats happening to stupid people?

describing steam as a store in this situation is inaccurate. they are providing the game server, setting up the match making, and enabling the communication between players. it puts them in a more reasonable position to moderate.

>Silicon Valley companies pay very well because cost of living is very high in the area

Isnt this backwards? Isnt the cost of living high because the companies pay so much?

dont they? isnt the point that you share your true location and in return see others’ true locations?

Seems like the variety of outcomes for allowing pets would make this prohibitive. Imagine the first time a dog bites another passenger or shits on a seat mid flight or starts uncontrollably barking.

More accurately, houses are expensive in places where many people want to live. The recommendation would be to buy a house where people dont want to live, which is kinda lame.

what better options do you mean?

why?

jesus ligotti. go look at a sunset. eat some ice cream. hug a loved one. good lord.

Putting out some simple numbers:

Let’s say you have a million users and once a month, 1% of them need to speak with a human for 15 minutes. That’s 30k hours of support per year, so like 15 full time employees just to be on the phone.

the gut feelings of working professional recipe creators seems pretty valid to me. id take that over a scientific approach that lacked professional experience to provide context.

Even worse about the title, lower income people all had the same drop. They just did it earlier. Really bad analysis and narrative building by the author.

if i were yougov, i’d take this result as an indication that my methodology for aggregating public opinion is bunk.

The idea that doing something wrong in one arena means we are justified to do something else wrong in another arena is incredibly self-sabotaging.