338 karma · joined February 3, 2011
1. https://blog.benw.xyz/2013/11/the-real-goofy-vs-regular-a-lo...
cuboid([5,5,5], fillet=2);
https://youtu.be/PBFPJ3_6ZWs?si=sTeRrqQ5umHsNCgz https://youtu.be/cQgcTkXacAc?si=CDj0G9Sh7S-wbLjN https://youtu.be/va1rzP2xIx4?si=cAp65hnmwtkrXgDc
> we also wouldn’t express someone being very focused as “being on Adderall”, or a very creative idea as being “on shrooms” in a scientific publication.
We don't because nobody does, and many people might not know what you mean.
It gets tricky when importing finished goods and with non-fuel sources of GHG, but it's way less complicated and more effective than any of the other proposals.
If I can't be 100% sure that people feel in the same way that I do, then asking that same question for robots is totally pointless.
The accountants wouldn't believe us when we told them that the machines were worthless after only 6 months.
What's really idiotic is defending a corporation's deceptive business practices by saying anyone who gets tricked is an idiot who deserved to get tricked.
People have been saying that if driverless cars are safer than humans by any amount we should allow them. I'm saying they should be much safer than humans before we allow them.
The public will not tolerate car manufacturers killing 10's of thousands of people per year just because they are very slightly statistically safer than the average human driver.
Regardless of whether or not you personally would pull the lever, you have to admit it's not the same as saving 1,000 lives.
If it's a tiny startup on mostly greenfield stuff then sure, but that's also not a reasonable proxy for the rest of the industry.
A week is just enough time to get a cursory understanding of the product and tooling and fix a newbie bug.
Everyone here is freaking out "oh no, Facebook is going to make something so entertaining society will collapse". I would be so proud of myself if I created something so entertaining society collapsed, lol.
I don't think creating fully immersive VR is inherently bad.