I think this is solvable by having some kind of betting token that itself accrues interest over time to reduce the opportunity cost but if regulators already don’t like prediction markets boy they especially wouldn’t like that.
18 karma · joined May 27, 2023
I think this is solvable by having some kind of betting token that itself accrues interest over time to reduce the opportunity cost but if regulators already don’t like prediction markets boy they especially wouldn’t like that.
It's pretty shocking that someone in the industry so long thinks that OSS maintainers owe him anything though, or that he didn't think to simply fork his own version - he must know this is an option. He's probably read the MIT license at some point in his career - has he never stopped to think about what to provide something 'as-is' means? His position suggests that he has the resources available to do a lot of things that were far less embarrassing than asking someone who owes him nothing to make his job easier.
If the maintainer said "I'm not releasing this until you grant me a support contract", maybe that would be extortion. Until then, he's simply getting the service he pays for.
I'm expanding my skillset from just programming and trading to include generative AI, currently making a mentoring companion to language learning. I've got strong soft skills from years working in care. I'm seeking junior trading roles or internships, or a similar career where risk is thought about a lot.
Location: Ireland
Remote: No preference
Willing to relocate: Anywhere in the world, UK + Irish citizenship
Technologies: Python w/ Jupyter notebooks and dataviz libraries, ChatGPT, C#
Résumé/CV: https://medium.com/@c0m/learning-the-business-of-risk-a1d69dda915a
Email: hn [AT] omaolain [DOT] comThis comment reads like ChatGPT being asked to be contrarian for contrarian's sake.
- Spend 15 minutes writing an essay structure in Google Docs (with the essay you already have, also maybe this step could be done for you by ChatGPT)
- Gradually rewrite the essay you've already got in front of you, which can look like a normal writing process
Congratulations, you have now not only got a legit looking edit history, but also you've rewritten what ChatGPT spat out, thwarting other potential methods of detection.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/hannity-offers-to-be-wate_n_1...
Judging from the tone, the writer was elated. She sent the email shortly after the second plane hit.
Info for the underinformed: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/behavioral-...
https://www.whoisaccessible.com/guidelines/largest-web-acces...
I'm not saying it's not the guns. But I am saying that the US is the only developed country with the problem on this scale and it's a probably a far deeper cultural issue than just access to weaponry.
Forcing students to wear clear bags is ridiculous security theatre to the particular detriment of students with needs from (possibly undiagnosed) scoliosis etc. Thank God that there are no winter coats which could easily hide a pistol and several mags or a knife! All this policy achieves is scaring people.
1: https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/amer...
2: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2023/04/28/teenag...
3: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/02/20/the-way-u...
4: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2019/03/homewo...
At the same time, whatever government opens that particular Pandora’s box is in for a hell of a ride, so I understand why.
I'm obviously an abolitionist but I would be much less worried about this if the powers matched the role. I'm sure HN could empathise better than most websites that giving a supposed read-only user unused, powerful permissions is probably not the best idea.
Entirely untrue. The monarch has a weekly meeting with the Prime Minister. There have been many cases of the Queen getting carveouts, influencing laws, and vetting bills. There is no law forbidding the monarch from not granting Royal Assent. This notion that the British monarch has no power is an absolute farce.
There’s also the whole concept of King’s Consent, wherein the King gets to vet every single bill for affect the crown's own prerogatives or interests, and negotiate secretly with the government to change the contents of that bill. The Guardian articles detail this process as well. If you seriously believe the King has no power in practice I have a bridge to sell you.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/King%27s_Consent
https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/07/revealed-queen-l...
https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/feb/08/queen-lobbied-fo...
https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jul/28/queen-secretly-l...
https://theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jul/28/revealed-queen-v...
The devil’s advocate argument that I can come up with for it is that it allows developers incapable of adding sufficient protection to have their work have protection of the law, rather than code.
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_City_Studios,_Inc._v...
Really hard to see this as anything other than at worst neutral.
> in any case, HIPAA will protect you
It protects you insofar as it disincentives honest actors from doing sketchy things with your data. It's punishment for orgs, not protection for patients, like how laws against murder punishes the murderer rather than protecting the victim.
The best thing a patient can do to protect their privacy is to be actively avoid of medical practitioners that, for example, use tools like this which send your private medical consultation transcripts to God-knows-where.
In the US, in NY at least, they do not. A case about exactly this (telephoto lens photography through someone else's window, later displayed as art) didn't survive a motion to dismiss. This was upheld on appeal. Foster v Svenson (2015).
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000017d-81be-dee4-a5ff-efbe7...
I wonder if the people who thought this xkcd was the ultimate rebuttal against those who think that these platforms should be more neutral are rethinking their stance on having a few very wealthy, very powerful people control major speech dissemination platforms.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-2...
FTX did something similar, though they just auto-converted them to and from fiat USD (again, notably, not applying this policy to Tether).