OverTheWire has some really fun wargames. I made it through Bandit and Leviathan not too long ago, and I only have one more challenge in Natas. They do a good job on the difficulty overall, not too difficult to start, but it ramps up pretty steadily, giving you a chance to learn. I'll have to get back on this over the weekend.
Interestingly enough, in my experience with Google Music, they've outclassed almost every other service I've used in both user experience, and technical innovation. (Spotify, Rdio, Grooveshark, Pandora, and I'm sure I'm forgetting one or two) However, that's just my opinion and personal experience. Plus, this little debacle will definitely give me pause should I ever consider Apple Music when switching music services in the future.
[Usersnap](https://usersnap.com/) might fit your needs perfectly. I just started experimenting with it myself, but it allows users to submit visual feedback via screenshots.
There seems to be Lorem Ipsum-esque generators for basically everything from kittens to Samuel L. Jackson nowadays, but surprisingly, I couldn't find a single one for emoji. It's largely useless, but a fun toy nonetheless.
This really gives very little information on what your app actually does. You should add an about/FAQs page, and really, really elaborate on what Howard does.
That's much more likely to be a specific DNS-server error. Try swapping out the DNS servers for one that's known to already work with the .guru TLD like Google's public DNS servers.
I wholly agree. The conversions may not be quite the same as just the word "Menu", (according to some AB tests I've seen) but it uses a lot less screen real estate than it. It also scales a lot better while still retaining meaning.
While I agree that this is a tender topic at the moment, I have a hard time stretching it out as far as to being offensive, since it's a cryptography challenge posted by a mathematician.
I do agree that there have been gross abuses of power committed over the past years, but this isn't necessarily something that should be the center of a debate on it. Especially since they aren't forcing you to apply to a job by participating in this challenge.
> "Kiera Wilmot got good grades and had a perfect behavior record."
What is wrong with this world? It's understandable that this was dangerous, but they just destroyed this girl's future. First of all, they released her name to the public, second of all, this was a first offence, third, this wasn't an intentional bombing. It literally says, it was a science experiment gone wrong.
For me, it's more personal than anything. I hate DRM, so I try and come up with a solution, which I want to turn into a startup. Also, I'm a first time/future entrepreneur.
Hehe, I find it interesting that Steven Forbes himself decided to comment on Bitcoin. Albeit, he only has a shallow understanding of it. The whole point of it being open source, is so that everyone has a say in it, not just one central entity, which he either doesn't get, or doesn't want.
I'd add an elif (or else if, depending on if your language can handle that shorthand) checking the total number of X+Y, as well as if X>Y, with a statement that says "Don't be afraid to fail."
I realized that after I posted the link, then I noticed another link was on the front page, so more or less redundant, but I predict the archive copy will outlive Angelfire.
If you give a man a match, he may start a fire, cook food, and feed the hungry, or he may burn down every house in a five mile radius. Everyone will point the finger at what might happen. So as cool as this is, I bet it could lead to some serious legal issues.
It doesn't seem too far off from distributed volunteer computing like BOINC or Folding@Home. It'd be interesting, but I'm sure people would gripe about privacy.
>>However, now that the publicity machine has cranked up enough noise to reach Facebook's ears, the company issued a statement: 'We've recently discovered an issue whereby some Facebook users may be unable to enter a birthday before 1910. We are working on a fix for this and we apologize for the inconvenience.'
I believe Facebook is just going to do exactly nothing about it. It's not going to affect their bottom line at all.
What happened to the entertaining, informative giant that used to be the Gizmodo/Lifehacker/Kotaku network? They've faded into a bunch of pageview garnering alarmists. Someone got me thinking like this, I don't remember who, but the more I look at it, the more it seems like they're just capitalizing on current events to garner page views instead of trying to... Oh, I don't know... Do something useful.