1,257 karma · joined August 9, 2011
Honest question: is this event statistically significantly out of line with historic trends? Is it better or worse?
It's sort of like the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal. If you actually meet the requirements of the test you don't need to be clever.
Edit : typo
For the better part of...15 years? I've been using various inspectors and dev tools. Like a chump.
I've heard managers often tout that "if your code is stable you'll never get paged". But that hides the fact that you're still on the hook to be available. So either you start shirking your responsibility or you reshape your life around some percent of non-working hours being owned by the company still.
Tge street-level character of a city isn't magically preserved because the acquiring company chose to retain the name. Example: I live near a sushi restaurant that has changed hands six times in my life. Two times they kept the name. One time they kept the facade. Never did they keep the employees. Maybe a token "manager" but the character of the place always shifts.
I like the metaphor because it really does ask the question "how much must one replace to make something indistinguishable from its progenitor?"
Now, when you see a before and after photo, or an advertisement, the default is to assume it has been manipulated. That change came about with broad access to once-rare tools.
Free speech refers to the speaker and the government. It does not mean you are free from the personal or professional consequences of speech.
https://www.ped30.com/2019/03/10/defense-apples-14-billion-r...
Edit for context: in 2018, 11.6bn or 5.1% of revenue. Compare to Amazon it's half as many dollars and 1/3 the percent.
(critique of the individual cited, not you)
In areas where fires haven't historically been as bad, it hasn't been necessary. A decade-long drought and environmental changes make things done elsewhere (Bay Area, for example) appealing in a new region.