2,044 karma · joined October 2, 2015
Make your point without the nonsense.
It's lonely.
What I mean is to say, it is a more honest/accurate statement that "you have zero chance of winning when you buy a lottery ticket" is more true than claiming they have a chance, (even if it is literally true) due to how our mind biases work.
With what army? Most estimates state they have lost well over half of their combat power. Russia is not doing anything but slowly (or sometimes quickly) retreating.
The vast majority of our support is in the form of weapons, and the vast majority of those weapons come from existing inventory.
Even the new spending is just money cycling back to US weapons manufacturers.
What good would weapons do to solve our domestic issues?
And it doesn't mean the rich will be paying a fair share, just that they will be paying more than the poor.
Russia had already shut down the pipeline and proven to be unreliable partner, and facing heavy sanctions.
It's not like the US needed the pipeline destroyed in order to be in the position to supply LNG to Europe.
Instead of doing that, discuss the scenario at hand.
There is no mention that people are being informed up front that they will be fired in 6 months, so your reply is not helpful.
I would argue that paying for reviews is inherently dishonest. So is giving away items for free for reviews.
There is a lot of strategic value to the island, even without the chips.
Most of the metrics mentioned are essentially unknowable or even subjective.
The overall point was that there are a lot of problems but we are not fundamentally changing the structure of society to address them.
Nothing "inevitable" about accidents.
I would not be so quick to dismiss the effects of staring into light bulbs for 8-12 hours a day.