cholantesh

>the Shah was liberalizing and modernizing his nation

Quaint revisionism; in fact Mossadegh was already actually liberalizing and modernizing the nation while Pahlavi was turning it into a US/UK client state.

Who is the 'cry wolf' here? A scientist that made an incorrect assertion that was rightly excoriated in the court of peer review? An underqualified writer publishing sensationalism in a tabloid? Lobbyists and politicians literally paid to amplify bullshit?

Hint: it's the latter.

How many of them are in favour of having their cities leveled by a rogue state?

Or they see the use of 'terrorism' in this context as the dogwhistle it is.

Maybe the Democrats should have presented a cohesive and attractive proposition to them? It's not like they didn't just have four years to build and enact one and then campaign on it instead of chasing the donor class for the nth time!

I'm a Fedora guy through and through but...did Ubuntu Touch die on the vine? It seemed like it was approaching some approximation of this.

What a solipsistic tantrum.

That sounds better but I like the granularity I get from scrutinizing specific files or the patch takes too long to review.

But how do you even judge that? You have a dataset of n=1 with no control. Besides, wouldn't you expect to learn 'more effectively' with a young adult's brain than a pre-adolescent one, particularly if you were getting the right level of attention from a teacher and the pace of study was being accelerated as you moved through primary and secondary school?

>Ouch, this makes the headline not sinply inaccurate. It makes the headline false.

To be fair, Hanlon's razor suggests it was most likely written by someone who _would_ conflate software with AI. Though knowing the reward structures in '''journalism''', it could still be deliberate.

Yeah it's so wild how multiple people can see reactionary bullshit for what it is.

>You don't even see how nice it is to just not have to carry the car key because its been just so ingrained into your life, that you accept it as something normal and expected.

Possibly, but alternatively, you've rationalized that a litany of features that proffer negligible improvements to the experience of driving a car and entrench car dependency are in fact worth having what you regard as cartoonishly oversized keys* that can give malicious actors faster access to a $50000 vehicle.

* I've very recently had about 5 different ones in my pockets on extended test drives and only the CX-5 I think fits this rubric, but meh

And people don't lose phones?

>With a cut key, I walk up to the car. I need to fish around in my bag to grab the key. I then need to stick the key in the door and turn it, using care to not scratch the paint. I get in the car, need to insert the key, turn it and hold it long enough for it to start. When I'm done driving, I take the key out, grab my bag, and get out of the car. I then need to once again insert my key into the door once again being careful to not scratch anything, turn it to lock. Then I need to put the key away again.

I'll be honest, this reads like a drastic overcomplication of a very simple transaction. Why can't you just put them in your pocket? Are you walking around like a frontier town sheriff with cylinder lock keys on an antique keyring?

Because it's a wild rube goldberg solution to a minor inconvenience.

Do they really, though? I don't know anyone who raves about how much more convenient button start is, they either dislike/distrust it or don't really care either way.

I dunno that the dialogue is any more shallow than what's present in the vast majority of JRPGs today, quite frankly, but it's quite likely that this is because it isn't voice (over)acted.

>Going through DOGE reports [with maximum credulity], it's scary how much money is wasted, squandered and laundered.

Fixed.

I dunno; I haven't played a JRPG in years that has the same sense of immediacy and emotional connection. I feel like there is a lot invested into overbearing systems of inventory management and skill progression that doesn't, for me at least, have the same draw.

Better part of my high school evenings were spent struggling through Seiken Densetsu 3 multiple times over with the class-changing guides on GameFAQs.

This doesn't answer the crucial question of why the change you're committing is necessary.

Polyrepos are not a requirement for deploying microservices, and if we're goging to discuss failures from an economic perspective, the ROI of LLM use qualifies. As it stands, claims of 'higher productivity' all seem to trace their origins to anecdotes, press releases, and self-reports on surveys.

Because vite means fast in French, which is ironic because French is a well-documented waste of time.

As the sibling comment suggests, the impulse is probably more on the part of an Ubisoft or an EA project director to avoid hiring a voice actor.

lmao

>The worst that would happen is that the forks don't stay updated.

Which is hardly trivial, there are hundreds of open issues on Bugzilla for XUL alone. Some of the gaps include accessibility issues, which is down more to Cr better supporting APIs provided by vendors like NVDA. This is first of all, not something that is 'easy to evade' for the affected demographic, and secondly something Mozilla was an industry leader in for a long time. Obviously, Google didn't invest in this out of any sense of altruism, but it speaks to the sustainability of browser development, and what approaches thereof actually work.

Pretty much all of those forks are small volunteer projects that rely on upstream work by Mozilla, who are already struggling to keep up with MS, Google, and Apple. We were already at a point where Mozilla was laying off technical staff a few years ago. We're now seeing sites just outright block Firefox because it's not worth the effort when most users are reaching for something built atop Cr. How would any of these forks survive?

Where does this come into play?

>they demand the right to redirect funds you give them towards discriminating against people they don't like.

It sounds _incredibly_ suspect, frankly.

Liquidate sounds a tad aggressive, maybe 'retire'?

By Anne "It's actually good to kill Palestinian journalists" Applebaum