3,469 karma · joined February 28, 2013
A simple requirement would be a strict upper limit of 1m²/passenger at all times for vehicles and pedestrians. Trivial to fulfil for considerate means of transportation and quite impossible if you want to lug two tonnes of steel around with you.
It uses a dedicated "bugs" branch checked out to a .bugs directory in the current working directory. To use, copy it to a git repository which has a master branch and a remote for this master branch an run it.
Very bare-bones, but so far sufficient and without external dependencies (but probably lots of security problems…).
> There were two decent solutions that would have ended this crisis within a year or two. One would have been that Greece default on its debts, paying back for example 30% of outstanding loans. Another would have been for Greece to leave the Euro Zone and go back to using the drachma (their currency before the Euro), and pay its creditors in the new currency. This new drachma would quickly fall in value as the Greek central bank would print more drachmas, making it easier to repay the devalued drachma loans.
How would defaulting on debts have solved any problems? Still nobody would have bought new Greek debt and since Greece was running at a deficit before it still would have run at a deficit, just without any additional funds. They still would have had to get their administration in order to actually collect taxes etc.
The second proposition is even more ridiculous, nobody would have bought the new debt, the Drachma would have been entirely worthless and any sort of import (of, e.g., medicine) would have been impossible.
Edit to add: And what happened of course proves that these two "alternatives" would have been ridiculous. Greece could easily have (on its own) decided to default or switch to a new currency. No outside power could force them to stay in the euro or pay their incurred debts. Yet somehow they decided against these measures and instead took the horrible low-interest loans offered to them.
Why would this make Cloudflare appear remotely trustworthy?
a) trust our ISP with DNS queries and IP addresses which fairly uniquely identify services or
b) trust Cloudflare with DNS queries and our ISP with IP addresses which fairly uniquely identify services or
c) move everything "behind Cloudflare" and solely trust Cloudflare
Given that I can cancel my ISP’s contract, I can hold them accountable if they spew my data into the internet and I have no idea who Cloudflare is or what their aims are, I’d much prefer a) over c). b) is just worse than a) or c).
Focus follows mouse is an extremely useful feature which allows you to move focus without changing the relative arrangement of windows to each other (whereas Alt+Tab or relatives would bring the selected window to the front).
Additionally, a top-level menu bar is always there and requires a horizontal layout (I think?). In a window, each application can decide to hide the menu bar at will with only a vertical panel being visible at all time in all apps.
It’s rather easy to seize transfers made to foreign companies in violation of a local law. So while that foreign company then wouldn’t have to have a presence in the EU, it also couldn’t receive payments from EU companies or customers.
Much the same way the US will complain if you transfer funds out of the US to terrorists or drug lords or whoever is politically unfavourable today.
Having a monopoly or being in a dominant position is not the problem. If ARM starts a pizza business and requires everyone who wants to buy mobile CPUs to also order pizzas exclusively from them, then this would be an equally-fineable abuse of a dominant market position and the EU would almost certainly step in.
As it stands, ARM doesn’t force others to buy pizzas exclusively from ARM PIZZA PLACE and hence doesn’t abuse its dominant market position in one market (mobile CPUs) to support its position in another market (pizzas).
Google, on the other hand, uses its dominant position in the "licensable mobile operating systems" market to support its position in the "internet search" and "browsers" market together with anticompetitive behaviour forcing its licensees to exclusively use the Google-approved version of Android.
At least the UK could argue that it may get better trade deals, but what's in it for Italy?
There’s no point for a company to build a convoluted website if any customer knows they can send an email to info@example.com or a direct message or a text "I cancel my contract with you, my account number is 1234." and the only claim the company could make to counter that is that it didn’t receive the e-mail/message. Not that it’s internal processes didn’t allow for the message to be received, but that its infrastructure never actually received it (in which case the user would have received an email bounce message). To be nice, request the company to acknowledge receipt of the notification and, if not received, repeat on multiple channels (including certified snail mail).
Oh, and make it illegal to hide surprising bits in terms and conditions due to the information asymmetry typically accompanying those :)
I find this actually quite good. Companies accepting "user uploaded content" are mostly entirely pointless, cost a lot of bandwidth and unnecessarily centralise yet another part of our lives. Anything which harms them will effectively be a net positive.
> #2 Link Tax: publishers want to be compensated if you link to their content. This is to prevent google and the like to profit from publishers content without “paying” for it. This is totally absurd. Again, two things will happen: large corporations will stop linking to publishers site (see how google Spain stopped their news offering) and second everybody posting links online publically will become an outlaw.
Note that it’s not a link tax but a tax to use snippets of the article. You’re quite fine linking to an article, but reproducing parts of it won’t be ok. Right now this is already a somewhat grey area and, again, it won’t exactly hurt anyone but the right people.
So, sure, this is some extra burden yadda yadda, but mostly it will just limit pointless business activities sucking up bandwidth.
$ apropos space
CORE (3perl) - Namespace for Perl's core routines
arpd (8) - userspace arp daemon.
CMSG_SPACE (3) - access ancillary data
CUDA_ERROR_INVALID_ADDRESS_SPACE (3) - (unknown subject)
cudaErrorInvalidAddressSpace (3) - (unknown subject)
df (1) - report file system disk space usageThat one I think is rather sensible for permission requests from apps. "Do you want to share your location with this app? - Yes/No; [] don't ask again", where the tickbox serves to store the preference forever. An alternative would be "Yes, always"/"Only now"/"Not now but ask again later"/"Never". Not sure which one I’d prefer.
After extension of the city of Berlin in 1921, this lead to it having many "city centres" around which life was formed in a similar way Sydney attempts to achieve now by this artificial after-the-fact split. I’m doubtful it’ll be successful.
This is not the claim in the linked article. The linked article claims that Tesla cars have a higher claim frequency than comparable gasoline-powered cars (i.e. large luxury cars such as a Porsche), whereas for example the Nissan Leaf has a lower claim frequency than comparable gasoline-powered cars (namely the Nissan Versa).
Put another way, if your choice is between a Tesla and a gasoline-powered large luxury car, the Tesla is more dangerous. If your choice is between the Nissan Leaf and the Nissan Versa, the Leaf is less dangerous. There was no comparison between the relative danger from a Tesla and a Leaf.
If you don’t insist on a single dense state vector but a sparser tensor network-based formulation, you can go to much larger systems (hundreds or thousands of spins) but will be limited by the amount of entanglement you can represent in your system.
At least it should be possible for a temporary maintenance window?
auto i = {5};
is a std::initializer_list<int>, whereas auto i{5};
is an int (as of C++17): https://godbolt.org/g/eXXN3oSee also https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25612262/why-does-auto-x... .