Source?
87 karma · joined August 18, 2013
Source?
- the first two were conducted while we were in the thick of the pandemic and loathe to be near anyone outside of our pod. WFH made sense then, and I’m sure people were more comfortable knowing they wouldn’t get Covid WFH
- the third was in 2023 when the world opened up, but studied call center operators. Yes, I can see how they would be more productive at home. However, imho any position that requires collaboration and many interactions between staff is more productive in the office and this study doesn’t address that.
Shouldn’t “one or more” be “more than one”? Or else there’s a whole lot more polyamorous folks out there…
It would only restrict people who are breaking the law.
Sounds good to me. Bring on the “but what if my friend is bleeding out in the backseat” arguments.
All but the wealthiest of retirees who make it into their 80’s and 90’s will spend any money they have on healthcare, until they are broke and then go on Medicaid.
In my experience so far, more often than not, it doesn’t get it right. Brings to mind the old maxim, “a broken clock is right twice a day”.
I think people confuse “indefinitely” with “forever”. They are not the same.
Genuinely curious, what makes biking not an option in Santa Fe?
It would also be nice if you could snooze them.
At this point if I really want to be alerted (leave now or you miss the train, etc) I set an alarm. But you can’t really do that any sooner than the day you want to be alerted because alarms don’t have dates (technically you can sort of do it with alarms on specific days of the week).
At least on iOS, I think calendar reminders (both native and gcal) are fundamentally broken. Their notifications easily get lost in a sea of other notifications and are easily missed.
undefined is not an object (evaluating 'swReg.pushManager.subscribe')