5,052 karma · joined April 2, 2013
But it doesn't come out without the context to guide it (prompting/skills/etc).
Your decisions start compounding. This keeps the why, so it compounds.
These are two sentences from the post that are supposed to be heavy hitter marketing lines but they are completely unable to be parsed in English. This is the gotcha of LLMs - it looks like words but there’s no actual writing ability here - just next token prediction.
Decisions don’t compound. You might say the the outcomes of poor decisions compound or something like that but these sorts of sentences are the uncanny valley of writing - it seems like writing but something is very wrong with it and that’s because it’s not actually stating anything.
Likewise “This keeps the why, so it compounds “ again - not actually a thought. What is compounding? What is growing here? Also no one talks like this, mainly because this isn’t actually conveying information.
The reason people hate AI slop is because at first glance it seems like you’re reading something that has something to say but you quickly find it’s an incredible amount of work to parse it due to poor readability, sentence structure etc and then further discover- oh there was nothing to gain from that effort in the first place. So the habit becomes “Ah slop? Not worth the time. Close tab.”
—Bill Gates
Note untested medicine is untested.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-dunning-kruge...
Eg https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328006677_Weaponizi...
This is an easy topic to find empirical analysis.