1,465 karma · joined October 12, 2010
Bring the ban to 2025? 2022? One can't simply expect mass production to switch that fast.
UK has already tightened emissions rules on vehicles and VED taxes more polluting cars more heavily. They could, and probably will, ratchet things more.
The right response on this policy is to say: great thanks Boris, you can clearly see the potential in green tech, now could you do X, Y, and Z too?
Yes, the government expects people to lap this up. Which is a reason why they do it. If they see electric cars both piss off the Daily Mail camp and yet are still criticised as worthless by environmentalists then we're not giving them the right incentives to take further measures.
:o that sounds quite frothy.
Instead, Julia should really be first to mind when considering that question. Although I might expect the author to respond with something about the mysteries of 'production'.
Whether the pattern of light hitting a building is copyrightable is likely to be an under-explored area of case law. E.g. in the UK it would probably have to be a work of 'artistic craftsmanship' which is not defined in the statute. But the Eiffel tower is in France. So now you have two slightly differing sets of copyright law.
In the end many IP cases come down to bluffing because the actual class of question has never been settled by a judge.
On the other hand you have other cases like Banksy today loosing a case on trademarking one of his paintings. Which was dumb because he'd have got further with copyright infringement.
- Why Engineering needs PDE solvers.
- Why Computer Science needs compilers.
- Why Geography needs digital maps.
This sounds like complete guff to me. Citation sorely needed.
Edit: Haha, went and checked. Damn the lying documentary I watched.
I'd rather have it that way round than get to the checkout and find 'O yea and there's £5.99 delivery charge as well'.
https://blog.usejournal.com/the-dark-forest-theory-of-the-un...
There, fixed that for you ;)
2. Surely UBI is cash, not vouchers. At which point the particular lower-than-face-value scenario is moot.
3. This is a valid point. I'm not sure whether it's good or bad, but it does seem likely to entail some morality shake-up.