Some commercial alternatives to MS Office:
https://www.wordperfect.com/en/
https://www.infomaniak.com/en/ksuite
https://www.hancomdocs.com/en/
543 karma · joined November 1, 2012
https://www.wordperfect.com/en/
https://www.infomaniak.com/en/ksuite
https://www.hancomdocs.com/en/
Of course, the performance will depend on the database.
K8S-based -
https://github.com/cozystack/cozystack
https://github.com/kubero-dev/kubero
https://github.com/pluralsh/plural
DCR-based -
https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify
https://github.com/dokku/dokku/
https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy
https://github.com/swiftwave-org/swiftwave
Most of these projects are maintained by a single maintainer; for business critical apps look elsewhere.
Path:
1. J-1 to H1B
2. H1B to EB-1 or EB-2 based upon your carrier path.
On similar lines, Fable [0] project recently announced rust & dart runtime support making F# a very attractive choice.
[0] https://fable.io/blog/2022/2022-06-06-Snake_Island_alpha.htm...
As there are multiple overlay projects popping up - Tailscale, NetMaker, OpenZiti, NetBird, Nebula, ZeroTier, EVPN, etc, we should consider a baseline benchmark index, like [2].
P.S. We have been testing ZeroTier for VPN access and observe ~70% baseline wire bandwidth.
[1] https://netfoundry.io/benchmark/benchmarking%20open%20source...
[2] https://techoverflow.net/2022/08/19/iperf-benchmark-of-zerot...
Why can't hardware vendors embrace standards-based open platforms like Global Platform [1].
[Edit] Google is also pushing Android Ready SE Alliance [2].
[1] https://globalplatform.org/
[2] https://security.googleblog.com/2021/03/announcing-android-r...
No GC API ?
They still can make $$$ from support licenses.
Path : Ivy > big tech > ivy > research lab > startup
Samsung/Motorola/ etc. should release OEM unlocked devices not just carrier unlocked that can be purchased directly from their online stores.
This will make adoption easy for these open Android projects.
Current reactive code is littered with async/await for every IO function, which feels like they are trying to bolt reactive behavior. Library-based threading model provide the sync thinking with optimized async compute model.
Is this a Google specific program or part of AOSP ?
For security critical applications, there needs to be a vendor-neutral program build upon open standards. Can another OS vendor provision attestation keys ?
GlobalPlatform [0] has standardized the SE space, general adoption of APIs is the next step.
We can have multiple implementations of the same API, but what I am seeing currently from the "commercial" vendors is the base K8s with UI changes. I hope we will have multiple implementations of the spec. The specs also have to evolve with time.
Last decade, systemd had its fair share of criticism. But it provided a consistent API to run "Compute Units" locally. K8s can benefit from the same principles to manage "Compute Pods" across the cluster. The concepts of promise theory [1] provide interesting control loop co-ordination.
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=...
Everyone hates XML, but for structuring UI elements it is one of the best tools.
I haven’t seen much documentation around DartVM.
Looking forward to CouchDB 4.0/FoundationDB goodies. Do we have any roadmap details on this.
fn name(a: int, b: int) -> void {}
This also helps with clean functional type arguments.
swift and rust support this.
A single consistent notation will be helpful for new polyglots.
Can we have a consistent function notation
fn name(a: int, b: int) -> void {}
This also helps with clean functional type arguments.
swift and rust support this.
A single consistent notation will be helpful for new polyglots.