Did any of these make it onto the market?
71 karma · joined October 11, 2012
Did any of these make it onto the market?
Originally there might have been an operator doing the adjustment daily, later mechanical automation, later electronic control.
The lake water continues out of the heat exchangers into the intake of the water treatment system, feeding drinking water to the city. The water eventually returns to the lake after being used by people and flowing through the sewers and wastewater treatment system (returned at a shallower level).
It seemed very well built on the outside, however eventually a number of keys stopped functioning. Taking it apart, I found that the plastic rivets holding the assembly together failed.
It was repairable by drilling and replacing the rivets with machine screws. Although original model M's were built in the same way, the design or manufacture of these rivets on my unit is completely insufficient. I'd expect better for a keyboard in this price range. This also seems to be a common problem based on scouring the forums. I'd hope this would be re-designed in newer models, however also don't hold out much hope.
This indicates you have a problem with temperature rise across the heat exchanger, probably from inadequate airflow. Your ducts may be sized too small/furnace too large, fan speed set too low, plugged filter, etc. You may be able to mitigate the problem by increasing fan speed, limiting heat by using stage 1 only, putting in less restrictive filter, add additional cold air return, etc.
Usually a failed limit switch means cycling and a bigger problem with airflow. However I have seen a high temperature limit switch fail without cycling - fell apart with age (40 year old furnace).
Unless the boot is majorly damaged, very limited dirt gets in, most of the grease stays in, and lifetime of the joint isn't severely impacted.
I would hazard a guess that Toyota and Lexus have very similar real-world reliability - most of them share platforms. However this article shows that Lexus owners perceive their cars to be more reliable than Toyota owners.
Somehow Mini is near the top of the list too
They also have a tiny, less powerful unit (mAP) that may fit with some travel use cases.
Canon offers adapters for their mirrorless cameras, both EF-M and RF. https://www.canon.ca/en/products/Lenses/Mount-Adapters
Nikon has the f to z adapter: https://en.nikon.ca/nikon-products/product/lens-mount-adapte...
Sony has an A to E adapter https://electronics.sony.com/imaging/imaging-accessories/ima...
Brings back memories of the mp3car (PC parts) and mp3ar (MAS3507d) projects. Going back to 2000 on archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/20000408180856/http://www.mp3ar....
Emissions factor is on track to almost triple between now and 2040. Plus, emissions scope doesn't include out of jurisdiction - the planned Lake Erie connector will bring in electricity from Pennsylvania which is significantly higher emissions due to coal. The Ministry of Energy requested the IESO review emissions impacts of this project however results have not been made public (...because it's high emissions).
[1] https://www.ieso.ca/en/Sector-Participants/Planning-and-Fore...
This was the first result when I searched: https://dosbox-x.com/wiki/Guide%3AInstalling-Windows-98
We built a demo app for use in physiotherapy to improve outcomes and ran a few clinical studies. The detection accuracy was excellent and patient reception was warm.
There are a number of competitors, some with multi-sensor systems targetted to pros, some with vision systems, etc.
We met with all the big fitness app makers and found generally while they weree somewhat interested in pose detection/accuracy assessment and feedback, it's not at the top of their list of priorities to implement (even to incorporate our 3rd party service).
I'm familiar with a couple designs - and on my vehicle I found it trivial to temporarily override (with the wiring diagram in the service manual).
My vehicles are on the older end of having immobilizers, but on them automakers certainly didn't integrate it tightly with other systems. It is controlled by one of the main ECUs - but the lockout method is subpar.
Better integration of the immobilizer goes along with the development of new engine management systems - so there may be more integration on vehicles with the newest engine designs (but not necessarily if the engine descended from a previous design and they kept the engine management system mostly intact....).
Some immobilizers disable starting, some disable fuel pump, some disable ignition, and some disable injectors. The how these are electrically disabled also matters a lot.
It's still trivial to override the first two methods, and sometimes the second two, but at least the last two have the potential to require more than a wire to disable if they are better integrated with the ECU.
My backup solution (backuppc/other syncs + zfs + sanoid/syncoid plus offsite server with zfs) means the backup server pulls files from the clients using backuppc/rsync. The backup server volume is zfs snapshoted regularly using sanoid. The offsite server pulls these from the backup server via syncoid/zfs send.
I'm not using rsync.net since I have my own infrastructure, but would definitely choose it as the offsite server if needed.
Agreed that the X220 form and function is excellent. The 7-row keyboard is amazing. The IPS screen is serviceable. The swappable 9-cell batteries give around 10 hours of battery life each. The i7-3520M is noticeably faster than the i5-8250U in my surface pro 6, even though benchmarks suggest it shouldn't be.
Just tried a new T14. The keyboard is decent. I haven't found any laptops with a keyboard as good as the 7-row.
I found the batteries in the rack version, where batteries lay on their sides, reach end of life much sooner than the tower version, where batteries are upright.
It's likely poorer heat dissipation/ventilation in the rack version, but may have to do with battery orientation. The rack version also seems to suffer corrosion damage from battery off-gasing if batteries reach critical failure and overheat. I haven't seen the same damage on the tower units. Again some combination of orientation and ventilation.
I used to build small networks including supplying 386 boxes that booted LRP from a floppy to share a dialup internet connection for small businesses or university student houses. A lot were 10b2 internal networks since they didn't need to spend extra on a hub.
Later, I remember choosing a Cisco Aironet 350? PCMCIA 802.11b card over the ORiNOCO (probably on price as I think both had wide compatibility and good power output) to use both in my NEC mobilepro and with a few improvised long-range wifi links. I built cantennas and biquads to get remote access to free and fast university internet....
Also remember trying to get my hands on a Senao 200mW PCMCIA card to squeeze out more range.
While swapping cells, just be careful to match voltage and severely limit current to avoid any danger/excitement. Sure you can find some forum posts on this. Also, the new and old cells must be brought very close in voltage as discrepancies are flagged disabling the battery. This also goes for between cells but allowable differences are larger. I think this battery has 3s3p configuration.
I've bought quality 18650 cells online 10 for about $100CAD for a x220 battery rebuild. More recently got 2x 2Ah 18v Ryobi packs which yeilded 10x cells total for $29CAD on clearance at Home Depot....
In the x220 battery packs the controllers are not locked down hard (the later x230 batteries appear locked down and cannot be reset the same way... likely need either special software or may be able to connect directly to flash). The controller (bq8030 or bq2090 or similar) nvram can be dumped and written using the laptops built-in battery management smbus.
I recently re-celled mine; dump the calibration nvram before starting (not the end of the world if you didn't). Buy whatever power tool battery is on clearance. Swap the 18650 li-ion cells. For a cheap and cheerful spot welder, you can buy a board with some FETs to switch power from a car battery. Restore the firmware. Run Lenovo battery calibration.
Lots of info at http://www.karosium.com/2016/08/hacking-bq8030-with-sanyo-fi... (no affiliation, but found it a great resource!). If you didn't save your firmware or starting from a toasted battery, compare and contrast to calibration dumps found online. TI also has general specs available on a similar controller.
The battery controller will set a bit to disable the battery when the cell voltages get out of sync when removing/adding cells (other ways of dealing with this too.... holding controller in reset, voltage in parallel). Restoring the nvram calibration data resets this. Finding most data in the dump was relatively easy by comparing to battery statistics available through ThinkPad tools. I have detailed notes and posted to comments at above site.
There's some debate on different cell charging profiles as the original cells were 4.1v versus modern chemistry being 4.2v and so potentially will end up undercharged... but I've had great success just dropping in and don't feel the need to squeeze out more capacity.
Took an afternoon to do....not necessarily worth it, but was a fun project to figure out. My 9-cell is back to 10 hours of runtime/way better than any aftermarket I've tried.
The only issue I've had is the battery charger circuit on some boards has a fuse instead of a diode making it a hazard (realized pretty quickly while testing). This is supposedly fixed on newer revisions but there's always a chance of getting an old one through some sources....
I believe hese new HGST drives are WDs.
The HGST drives in the older backblaze stats (which showed good reliability) continue to be manufactured by/evolved into Toshibas. There are several HGST model numbers that remained in Toshiba's lineup.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/5635/western-digital-to-sell-...