1,078 karma · joined March 7, 2014
Alex Jones needs clicks and pageviews so it will be more of the same
> Will there be no more school shootings because Obama/Hillary and the federal government are no longer trying to take our guns away?
it will be because of democrats in the senate or house, or at the state or local level. Plenty of scapegoats to go around
> Will ISIS no longer attack the US because Trump is being "tough" on them and the president is no longer refusing to say the words "radical islamic terrorism"?
it will still be their fault for letting isis happen in the first place
> So many intriguing questions
Maybe for people who are new to politics. The same script will repeat in 8-16 years
I assumed "killing people" was broad enough to include obvious cases such as war :)
> So, back to my first questions; who benefits from manipulating medical and aircraft equipment on a large enough scale to be compared to potential financial fraud
Competing corporations via corporate espionage. A targeted hack against Siemens infusion pumps would force hospitals to consider alternatives.
> It's not that I don't trust the computers, it's that I don't trust people.
Every system in the world has been created by people with their own biases and faults. If we are really going down that path, then you must seriously consider going off the grid.
Wars are extremely profitable for some.
> I think you're exaggerating just a bit.
I think you are being myopic. We trust computers with thousands of important tasks. If we can't trust them for voting, we really have to reconsider their usefulness.
The republic is experiencing significant harm. If it was not, people would not be talking about it.
> How will you know if an electronic voting system produces a wrong result, except by running a paper voting system in parallel?
Audits? Open Source? Checksums? Hashes? We have many tools to verify the integrity of electronic data (I also never claimed it had to 100% digital)
> Do municipalities choosing voting machine contractors have incentives aligned to promote election integrity? Can they critically evaluate security properties of what they're being sold
If the choice is federally verified company A or federally verified company B, then yes.
Killing people. Imagine a StuxNet type attack that targets medical equipment or an attack that can drop planes from the sky (https://www.wired.com/2015/05/feds-say-banned-researcher-com...)
> I would second guess anything that uses a computer to keep a record of something that someone would have a direct benefit if manipulated
Then you better move to the woods. Basic economic principals (scarcity) mean that every resource has value to an interested party.
* Count and record our money
* Operate and monitor medical equipment
* Monitor and control planes, trains, ships, and cars
* etc
To think that we cannot use a computer to record votes is insane.
So for 1,100 you are getting half as much ram, half as much storage, and a lesser gpu.
I'm sure you could spec out something similar to the internals for a few hundred less with a little bit of work.
Here are 10 things you will do after ad blockers kill the web (You won't believe number 7!!!!)
which one of those ports can I use to plug in my lighting headphones?
The target market for this is people who buy a $1,800 wacom cintiq and pair it with a $1,000 computer.
The price is reasonable for the people it targets.
This is a great way to make a game that is pretty but boring.
According to the author: The screen makes photos look better. So if you use your phone as the primary device to view photos, and don't want to carry a second device to take them, this may be the phone for you.