Been using it for years because it gives pretty fine grain controls over streaming vs downloading the entries, how many entries to maintain, how often to check, etc.
2,482 karma · joined September 19, 2010
Reach me on Fedi/Mastodon @digikata@fosstodon.org
Been using it for years because it gives pretty fine grain controls over streaming vs downloading the entries, how many entries to maintain, how often to check, etc.
https://www.openfabrics.org/images/eventpresos/2017presentat...
Ask HN: Usefulness of social network data for epidemic management?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22440114
But really it seems like a natural reaction to want to help, but I suspect if you aren't already tied in to a network of people/resources with a jump on the issues already, that coming up to speed is more of a idle thought than practical.
And really SpaceX had a general experience edge in terms of coming off of designing a lot of wholly new and successfully working non-human rated space gear.
Boeing has experience in maintaining working space gear and process, but it's not the same scale of new product and process.
Sustaining B2G after the SBIR wins may or may not work out - its best if the area ties into some longer term need/consumable so you have some businesses with the gov't after the SBIR phase ends.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_system_in_Japan
In contrast, in the US, there are 16 non-medical, mostly billing personnel per doctor.
For critical parts on the aircraft, there is the backup of inspecting for aspects like accelerated fatigue just for variation of manufacturing, of environmental contributors, etc. It's a lot like security defense in depth - many layers of protection for lives (and aircraft industry trustability linked to profitability too) at stake.
(and of course there is the case of the part being damaged somehow, where some of the other comments have linked cases where this happened catasropically).