461 karma · joined March 10, 2026
It’s a human connection. Most of us have spent time working on something we appreciate that others don’t value. We recognize and appreciate that. Digging into and noticing the details gives us an appreciation for the effort of the creator. Did they add a delightfully unexpected bit of polish?
People appreciate “wasted” effort.
I don’t care that an AI did a good job. Maybe the first time it was impressive. The Nth time? Meh. And ideas are the easy part. We could have 1,000 “look! I made my windows look like ham” apps and no one would care. But 1 hand crafted really good “look I put a disco ball in the desktop, see how it lights up the windows from behind!” App Would be amazing.
But this Apple arrogance is also why they are Apple. And why you are using a software keyboard and a phone shaped like a dark mirror.
Also, in the article they mention a significant number of patches for older versions as well.
The buyer is also signing up for a monthly payment. So clearly they have the cash to make an “extra monthly payment” or two up front.
To put it another way, it helps me recognize which tabs I am using. And which I am saving for later without having to evaluate the content of the tab.
One tweak… the coverage percentage can it be adjustable? Max = 100% looses all information about the pages contents, except the title.
Also also… if the images can be made translucent… you can make old timey effects like yellowing and decay.
Tandy CoCo 2. Followed by a 386 20Mhz where I graduated from Basic to Turbo Pascal and Turbo C++
I think 78 and fine is better than 45 and 80 in pain.
But in this country we are so adverse to giving someone agency over how their life ends.
Because it’s not good Business.
Centering is not easy. Apparently. It requires human eye to verify. I can prove my decryption algorithm works. I can’t prove centering works.
If they are not a clanker.
You essentially said: you’re wrong, it is autonomous when it doesn’t need a human during one specific part of its overall usage.
Back in the day, I looked down my nose at other young fledgling developers that would #define true 1. I knew only clarity and woe lived down that road.
if(5-2 == true) ;
As verbose as it was stupid.I felt superior because I knew that #define false 0 was the only Boolean keyword hack that would work.
if (5-2 != false) ;
Still verbose, and stupid, but at least it was correct.These days… I don’t feel as confident about anything as I did about those #defines.
Maybe we aren’t so rare. I can think of another group that values enduring hardship over progress making things easier for everyone.
They don't get a pass because you disagree with an imagined use case.
You do not have all your states available.