3,163 karma · joined March 13, 2017
https://octo-ring.com/
Personal site: https://jse.li/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/__jesse_li
{ email_address: 'run my js!'.split('').map((_,$)=>'jse.li'[Math.round(0x01-Math.sin((0x0a* $+0x20)/0x04))]).join('')+0x7b+'@gmail.com' }
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/veggiedefender; my proof: https://keybase.io/veggiedefender/sigs/SnpihznZY3vIlslpw5DrAnSH05cP-Y8UUiqdfW44i2k ]
> With an annual budget of about $9.9 billion (fiscal year 2023), the NSF funds approximately 25% of all federally supported basic research conducted by the United States' colleges and universities. In some fields, such as mathematics, computer science, economics, and the social sciences, the NSF is the major source of federal backing [...] Since the technology boom of the 1980s, the U.S. Congress has generally embraced the premise that government-funded basic research is essential for the nation's economic health and global competitiveness, and for national defense.
Multiplication commutes (a fact pointed out by everyone) but our human brains are better at multiplying some numbers or fractions than others. Computing 50% of 34 is easier than 34% of 50 because we are more accustomed to cutting things in half than multiplying two-digit numbers.
And it's even more lovely when you realize that this applies equally to computers where you may have to rearrange terms or rewrite formulas to get better numerical stability.
https://faculty.washington.edu/timbillo/Readings%20and%20doc...
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/To-the-Point-Heat-Treating-Alu...
My argument summed up is that slavery was a "local maximum" that A) generated an enormous amount of wealth early on, and was thus a crucial factor in developing the American economy, even if it was no longer the main driver of wealth by the time of the civil war, and B) made it unattractive for the south to risk seeking a global maximum (investing in industrialization) a strategic misstep for sure.
It's clear which strategy wins long term, I don't think that's a debate. I should have phrased my earlier comment better, sorry.
> Where were the industries in the South? Where were the industries in South America?
They weren't there precisely because slave labor was so profitable that they did not see the need to industrialize.
> Why did the South secede to protect their economy from the North?
The south seceded in order to protect the institution of slavery.
> Take a look at contemporary photos and paintings of the North and South before 1865
Good thing we don't measure wealth by photos and paintings, and instead we have census data. Be serious, think about why an economy based on slave labor and agriculture would not build a network of railroads even if they had the money for it.
You've reduced slavery to a parenthetical. Where do you think the cotton and tobacco went? Where do you think the money came from? Where do you think it got spent?
https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/8/16/20806069/slavery-ec...
There are a lot of ways to profit from suffering. And sometimes it's not even about profit—it can just feel so good to have an Other to oppress.
1. 41c1811210a65a2ab18d8265
2. 0e7d857840ceffdb5e1f16c8
3. f4915878b5733fbf0786100b
4. a07f35c0ffa1f9a6d2b608be
5. 8c96b6fca46ae4fb62a99fb6
By building this, I accomplished my first goal: 1. build a site for sharing hashes of my goals
Secret key: 28be20427ece88ed
Verify at https://jse.li/secret-resolutions/verify#41c1811210a65a2ab18...Some names you can look up are Johann Lavater, as well as Alphonse Bertillon, inventor of the mugshot, and Francis Galton, inventor of composite portraiture.
https://robertheaton.com/2018/07/09/how-tinder-keeps-your-lo...
That's why you were not allowed to like or retweet posts that linked to substack, right?
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarchopac-means-and...
Granted, the hard science is helpful in getting to the next level and achieving a product that's consistent from batch to batch.