I like that is supports all of the modern ciphers (Paramiko, in particular, doesn't). It's also mostly feature-complete. Props to the author, this appears to be the work of a single guy!
824 karma · joined June 1, 2014
I like that is supports all of the modern ciphers (Paramiko, in particular, doesn't). It's also mostly feature-complete. Props to the author, this appears to be the work of a single guy!
Everything else? VMs it is. The overhead is so low nowadays that it's totally irrelevant for the vast majority of use cases.
> It leaves no traces in any logs (wtf?). It keeps working even if you disable "FMG-Access". It won't let you define an admin user with the same name to mitigate it, so make sure that SSH access on your devices is at least restricted to trusted hosts!
Source: Fortinet admin
But I also see how "safe spaces" would be useful and how critical discourse could be used for bullying. I've not read enough about this to make up my mind on this. Was the Yale thing an unexpected outcome?
> If you look at it from an outside perspective, both sides are right.
That's kinda how it feels to me. In most of the conflicts I've read about, one side is right (look at this - if what she writes is true - and there's no reason for me to believe otherwise, how would you reasonably argue against that?, but then I read about "safe spaces" at universities and can only think how dumb of an idea this is), but instead of a civilized discussion which might actually change people's opinions, a shirtstorm ensues.
Please disagree with me if you think that I'm wrong on this - I'm really just an outsider who occasionally reads about this on Twitter and shakes his head.
As someone who didn't really follow the whole controversy the past years, this was an eye-opener for me. Did it really get that bad?
Stop tolerating the intolerant! Also, I don't understand the point of GamerGate. As an outsider, all I see is two groups making themselves look really bad and everyone else loosing. You don't convince others by threatening and harassing them, something the extremes at both sides seem to do. Why?
By the way, note how she did not mention the harasser's username in her post.
Phabricator is much more flexible and that comes with a small cost in complexity, but the result is a system which provides a superior workflow, especially in enterprise environments:
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-advantages-Phabricator-ha...
An incomplete list of projects using it, some of them VERY large:
- Blender (https://developer.blender.org/)
- LLVM (http://reviews.llvm.org/)
- Haskell (https://phabricator.haskell.org)
- Wikimedia (after lots of discussion and a lengthy selection process, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/)
- FreeBSD (https://reviews.freebsd.org/)
- Fedora (in some places, for example: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/)
- Khan Academy (https://phabricator.khanacademy.org/)
- Enlightenment (https://phab.enlightenment.org/)
- KDE (https://phabricator.kde.org/)
- Freedesktop (https://phabricator.freedesktop.org)
- lighttpd (https://review.lighttpd.net)
- Kolab (https://git.kolab.org/)
- ...
Wikimedia hat lots of content about their choice and the migration process: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/FAQ
Phabricator has been in use as a production tool for years and it shows. It is much more sophisticated in terms of workflow and real-world use than alternatives.
org-mode and evil-mode alone, without Spacemacs, work pretty well already. It's just additional glue to make it more seamless.
Most people use it for planning, but it's also a very nice personal wiki. The great thing is that you can define your tasks inline, if you want.
Thanks for the reminder!