I don't think it applies to the kind of people that YC is targeting - young, mobile, no dependents, able to live on very little $'s a year or the technology segment which is consumer web startups.
145 karma · joined July 29, 2007
I don't think it applies to the kind of people that YC is targeting - young, mobile, no dependents, able to live on very little $'s a year or the technology segment which is consumer web startups.
Talks about important things like cash flow. Ironically I don't know of many startup/business books that talk about such important practical stuff.
Highly recommended!
No need to imagine. Just look North -- this is reality.
Neither RIM (makers of the blackberry) nor Cognos (now IBM) took VC funding.
VC has imploded in Canada and startups are surviving as they have always.
I agree with this from experience!
Is it normal for angels to take 600 hours to complete a deal -- from first meeting to signing on?
Oil is a finite resource. You can increase infrastructure to get more but in the end there is no more than a finite amount of oil on the planet.
'Bandwidth' on the other hand is infrastructure dependent. Increase the number and width of pipes (or tubes! :) and you increase data throughput.
;)
Brings to mind the oft-quoted "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
who's the lucky girl?
Q: What does the Band look for in their initial review?
As with most venture funds, the Band seeks to invest in companies with a strong management team, unique technology and a large potential market.
Not really... http://www.bandangels.com/ What's the difference between YC and these guys? Maybe in the amounts invested.
Hmm.... have you read ojbyrne's post: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=143269
?
To be fair if you were an employee, i.e. you got paid well I assume? there was less risk on your part relative to the founders. So your equity should be a fraction of what the founders took in. Why would it be otherwise?
Lions roaming free and now caged lions as well. Okay maybe a little richer than other caged lions ;).
Yes.
>I think we have many software/web startups and not enough startups in hardware.
I think we have the right number. ;)
I don't agree with your statement. I think we hear more stories of dropouts starting companies because they are rare and make interesting stories.
For instance: 1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Warnock 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_M._Jacobs 3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Samueli
. .
If anything you know a lot more in your domain of expertise and are in a better position to start a co. Plus you're hungrier -- grad students make very little money. A formula for startup success.
"Maybe we should redefine the Masters to include some research work."
Actually the Masters does in fact include research work. At least mine did.
I thought a more reasonable path to this would be to join a startup or three, get rich and then spend the rest of your life getting a PhD, working on interesting problems, etc. No? ;)