I think you need to see the problem in terms of "bigger, more protected bikes" rather than "tiny cars"
303 karma · joined October 28, 2010
I think you need to see the problem in terms of "bigger, more protected bikes" rather than "tiny cars"
It's feasible when you're running a preprocessor on your own code one time, but not feasible for the browser to do on unknown code on every stylesheet it encounters.
It’s even worse at established tech giants like FAANG, where everyone working at anywhere other than SF would optimally declare fully remote for the free salary increase
I actually don’t know
When some force acts to remove those objects from the magnetic field, that energy is converted into potential in the magnet again.
Are you claiming that the alignment of the magnet will fade slowly over time when the field is interacted with, more quickly than it would if it were left on a proverbial shelf for millions of years?
If your marketing department want one more tracking script and your execs want one more pop up banner etc and each change is bad but not egregiously so, then your average "web guy" at most non-big-tech companies will just do what they're asked to.
With AMP they get to say "it's not possible"
Your marketing department wants another tracking script? no can do. Your exec wants a javascript "click the monkey" promo? not on the AMP site. The UX folks want parallax webGL spinning logos? Sorry AMP doesn't allow it.
It puts people who were previously not in a position where they could push back against decisions which effect load speed in a position where they can push back.
The government continues to reduce the amount of money they send to the BBC, which continues to produce world-class television and is struggling to find the money to do so.
They've decided that they will no longer offer the complimentary license to the elderly.
None of that should have any bearing on the accuracy of their environmental reporting.
"That person said something I disagree with" doesn't imply that you have the right to demolish their property and their job.
I'd like my car to make value judgements about what's safer - braking and colliding with an object or swerving to avoid it. I'd rather it brakes and collides with a child than swerve into oncoming traffic, but I'd rather it swerved into oncoming traffic to avoid a truck that would otherwise T-bone me.
As long as the system only acts in the best interest of it's passengers, not the general public, it's fine by me.
Sure, you're paying more than you would have if you waited, but you were happy to pay XXXXUSD per month to have somewhere to live, and your relative mobility has actually increased if we assume that the housing market fell by a flat percentage.