2,700 karma · joined March 13, 2007
I fully respect all the work of people who work on "hard problems" - I even believe that I have and continue to work on "hard problems" every day. The list of things the OP used were basically "skills" not problems (virtual destruction semantics, references, pointers, etc). It's the attitude I dislike, not the desire to do hard things. The attitude that "these things are hard to understand and therefore more interesting and more worthy" is ridiculous, and shows that the writer doesn't actually understand any of the things he hasn't worked on.
I don't diss people working on hard things - I diss people who call everyone who doesn't work on what they work on weenies.
I'm fully confident in my intelligence without playing stupid games.
I don't think this would be a particularly hard thing to build as a weekend hack...
If you are going to focus on a twitter feed, you need to be a more critical reader, but it seems to be quickly self correcting.
Follower count is the only way to recognize spam/junk accounts. If someone follows 10k people and has 4 followers... obvious spam account.
While the characters are not toys, cars, or fish (which are easily merchandised) they are still cute. It will probably sell (at box office and toy shelves) at the same level as Ratatouille, but that is still a major success for any other studio on the planet.
Pixar used to be lauded for its originality and commitment to high quality. Suddenly, it's being panned for those same things.
The same could be said for the legacy airlines. They made their contracts under regulation, where they could raise rates to match their labor costs without fear of competition, and now are suffering the consequences.