2,342 karma · joined March 12, 2009
A better solution is websites actually accepting the “do not track” requests that browsers already send. Unfortunately the most popular web browser is run by the most popular tracking company, who also almost wholly funds the second most popular browser.
Like Google?
> You may purchase this paper on-line in .pdf format from SSRN.com ($5) for electronic delivery.
> You are eligible for a free download if you are a subscriber, a corporate associate of the NBER, a journalist, an employee of the U.S. federal government with a ".GOV" domain name, or a resident of nearly any developing country or transition economy.
A subscription in the US, where my tax dollars fund this work, is $2675/year for the whole body of work, or $705/year for just this subject.[1] WTF!?
So I googled the title and it's available for free, legally on SSRN[2]. Maybe change the post url to that?
[1] https://www.nber.org/wpsubscribe.html
[2] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3241102
There is no specific evidence for this, but it is a possibility. Balancing remote possibilities and accepting some that are beyond our control is what separates the sane from the tinfoil hat crowd. Personally, I would try to stick to apps by companies headquartered in your home country. This is difficult outside of the USA and probably impossible outside of the next 5 top software hub countries.
Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in sewage / Medema, et al.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.29.20045880v...
Check out Table 4.
I think you missed the caption on the black and green picture:
> This image shows how the Lyme bacteria, Borrelia burgdorferi, form protective round body "persisters" when threatened by defensive immune system biochemicals in blood serum.
Re: #2
You don't need approvals to test in mice.
Re: #3
Antibiotics kill/greatly-diminish gut flora. Azlocillin is an antibiotic related to penicillin.
The other promising drug mentioned, disulfiram, is nothing to be trifled with, either:
In the current COVID-19 pandemic, a significant proportion of cases shed SARS-Coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) with their faeces. To determine if SARS-CoV-2 is present in sewage during the emergence of COVID-19 in the Netherlands, sewage samples of 7 cities and the airport were tested using RT-PCR against three fragments of the nucleocapsid protein gene (N1-3) and one fragment of the envelope protein gene (E). No SARS-CoV-2 was detected in samples of February 6, three weeks before the first case was reported in the Netherlands on February 27. On March 5, the N1 fragment was detected in sewage of five sites. On March 15/16, the N1 fragment was detected in sewage of six sites, and the N3 and E fragment were detected at 5 and 4 sites respectively. This is the first report of detection of SARS-CoV-2 in sewage.
The detection of the virus in sewage, even when the COVID-19 prevalence is low, indicates that sewage surveillance could be a sensitive tool to monitor the circulation of the virus in the population.
The same could be said for architectural renderings showing a handful of visitors at a place designed to be crowded.
[1] https://www.ikea.com/us/en/images/products/pax-corner-wardro...
[2] https://www.closetsbydesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/C...