Now, the real scandal was that the courts just assumed his intent and just assumed he wanted to harass jews. Which is ridiculous.
-8 karma · joined September 23, 2017
Now, the real scandal was that the courts just assumed his intent and just assumed he wanted to harass jews. Which is ridiculous.
I'm not trying to offend people or anything, but where is the evidence for this in GNU specifically?
Jones was just the start. Why shouldn't conspiracy theorists have the right to use social media? What's next? Can they have a back account? Credit card? Just a month later, we had a huge purge on Facebook and Twitter, targeting mostly left wingers, libertarians and alternative news sites. Sure, some of these are wacky people, but some provided honest content from a different, anti-government viewpoint, like Dan Dicks from Press For Truth for example. Why shouldn't those voices be heard? https://uk.pcmag.com/facebook/117908/news/facebook-purges-80...
https://www.rt.com/usa/441140-facebook-purge-victims-speak/
We should be careful cheering social media giants just banning people. It will backfire
If this is good or bad is another question. Everyone builds their own echo chamber, consciously or unconsciously. Thats why I don't appreciate the one-sidedness of the article. They make it sound like only republicans like to live in their bubble.
American women are not far behind Scandinavian women on the equality index. Same applies to them.
Then I provided data. I don't care about anecdotes
If you are interested in an opposite opinion from another woman coder: https://medium.com/@marlene.jaeckel/the-empress-has-no-cloth...
Reality looks very different.
Women have a 2:1 chance over men to get a job in STEM: https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/11/04/women-favored-2-...
more detailed research on this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4611984/
Then there's the Scandinavian gender paradox, which states that women are LESS likely to choose a career in STEM the more equal society becomes. This is because there's no more economic necessity, and other reasons. See http://www.thejournal.ie/gender-equality-countries-stem-girl...
I'm not surprised by the responses of these women. They represent the acceptable opinion of Silicon Valley.
This is not about conservatives, it hits everyone, ESPECIALLY LEFT WINGERS: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/3/17644180/po...
Making this issue a conservative vs liberal issue is dishonest and doesn't get us anywhere
Making this issue a conservative vs liberal issue is dishonest and doesn't get us anywhere
Look at what's happening at college campuses. Students and administrators are openly against free speech, because it "harms minorities"
- Most unequal state in America
- VERY high taxes (that are supposed to stop inequality, but it doesn't. Surprise)
- skyrocketing housing prices
- Very illiberal mindset towards the first amendment, especially on college campuses and in younger generations
- Allows illegal citizens to vote
- Very "shallow" show-off culture due to the show biz
Now, the crazy annoying right-winger Candance Owens just copied the same tweets and replaced white with black. What followed? Banned.
Twitter does not uphold their now standard independent from political affiliation. They can do that, it's a private company, but they should not LIE about it.
Do you understand where I'm coming from?
I agree in the larger sense though. In my opinion, the only way to stop a corrupt government is to shrink it.
In general, I don't think it's a good idea for the government to decide what I can post on social media or not. There are already laws against defamation and "volksverhetzung" (sry I don't no the translation, basically it means I can't say "kill all the jews/muslims, they are filthy swines"), so keep the internet free from more regulation on speech. The internet is one of the last places where people have some sort of freedom of opinion/listening to different opinions, and our lawmakers make it more and more unfree.