gchamonlive

Would also like a write-up. People assume it's just because of GitHub outages, but GitHub is slightly worse in every aspect, so for big projects and organisations it compounds to being quite messy to manage and operate.

GitLab is thought-out to support larger groups with more complex pipelines, and while it's got it's own set of quirks, it doesn't begin to compare, GitHub in contrast seems like a toy forge for toy projects.

By this definition if they could instead buffer recent facts and then offload to their weights reliably and efficiently they would be able to accrue knowledge despite their substrate.

Yes but can you plan anything properly in advance? How many unknown unknowns aren't being accounted for? Maybe it's best to plan for improper planning. What to do when (not if) critical decisions start falling apart?

Yes but it's very hard when those that make the rules are the same as those benefiting from them, as it's the case in olygarchies.

Apart from the fact that Meta admitted to it (https://www.brasil247.com/brasil/meta-admite-restricoes-a-co...) there is always the practical experiment anyone could have done at the time that meta's AI would deny making an image of Lula but would gladly create one of Bolsonaro (https://g1.globo.com/tecnologia/noticia/2026/10/14/ia-da-met...)

That and the fact that US is actively putting money into favouring the candidate that's offering them access to Brazilian rare earth reserves (https://valorinternational.globo.com/politics/news/2026/09/3..., https://amadomundo.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/memorando-... and https://youtu.be/xPlKzqiYH5c?si=Cw4YGXU8B2Xb2EHY) we are looking at a direct attack against Brazil's right to self determination by the US and its corporations.

If they have obvious similarities, they aren't randomly distributed data

  Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that". 

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

The urban lifestyle is also to blame when it demands a lot of time for work and commute, leaving the individual with little time for self improvement and free time. It deteriorates the third place by not allowing time to dedicate to it.

These however are all effects of a larger mentality of hyper-individualism and hyper-productivity, symptoms of late-stage capitalism.

"Going rogue" and "skipping basics" all assume lack of intentionality. Is it known that they didn't really architect these hacks just to feed a hype?

Sure you are

Nobody understands Brazilian politics as of now, and if anybody tells you they do they're lying. We're living in unprecedented times, literally.

Only if you don't really understand ethics.

We're considering these implications right now, so yeah it's preposterous, but you'd be surprised (or maybe not) with the number of people that would dismiss these considerations as pointlessly delaying progress.

I'm Brazilian, I'm feeling the world ending effects of colonization today with the US actively sabotaging our democratic election process, so you bet I do, but anyone with a bit of humanity would also feel the same way.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/30/trump-state-...

If these worlds had biomes it would be imoral to colonize, because for the indigenous population already living there our arriving could mean a world-ending event for them. We have to be very careful these are sterile worlds before sending missions.

It's important to separate the community ethos and the rust core dev team policies, because I'd be surprised if the official stance of the rust team would be condescending to other technologies.

There are many ways to say the same thing, that code throughput wasn't the only bottleneck, communication is by far the hardest, most brittle and time consuming part of software production.

We need to start becoming better writers, capable of expressing complex thoughts concisely and with technical precision. Software production has become a sibling field to linguistics, more than it already was.

Care to say why my interpretation is wrong other than lack of subscription, because from where I'm standing, I'm the only one weaving any form of logical interpretation while your argument is basically "what a loser"

Is this really the case? Because GitHub availability has been going downhill since way before models hit that critical mass of quality end of last year.

There ain't no free lunch, but real progress rarely depend on it. It's usually lunch we weren't eating before, or a different way to eat the same lunch but with much more satisfaction.

I agree there's less delegating now in these areas, but these are mostly topics of the past. Which half truths are we swallowing now, unknowingly most of the time, spoonfed by corp propaganda?

Lest you make them martys. Much better if we somehow turned them, used the one ring against them.

Never I think, it's time we started choosing not to.

Remember what is need not necessarily continue being so.

More importantly, when will the common folk stop delegating critical thinking to these corporations?

It's really important uphold the law, but nothing really happens if the collective attitude won't change.

Yeah, but this is like, your opinion man

How do you handle false positives in the detector?

Aren't diffusion models token-free?

Wouldn't feel the need to if folks would follows the community guidelines and stopped feeding the hysteria

This is Microsoft scale, I'd be surprised if it made any difference these labs. It's more likely it's plain managerial mishandling of the infra in chasing new profit heights.

I remember before COVID I was debating with a friend of mine whether or not private property is justifiable and it's ironic that the discussion was made obsolete by nobody being able to afford private property anymore