And computer viruses? Any one ever been delivered anthrax through email?
838 karma · joined August 27, 2011
And computer viruses? Any one ever been delivered anthrax through email?
I think a lot of the industry's professionals are looking for innovation and a way into the future while the industry itself refuses to provide.
Wow, I never new that. Granted I know very little of the legal implications of incorporating, but still. I wasn't expecting it to be so plain. Corporations have a legal obligation to not care about anything but money. Explains a lot.
It's just another example, outside of tech, of the patent system hindering entrepreneurship and business instead of empowering it.
Having it be verbose is great for learning, but after a short while syntax like:
do_send_email(recipient, cc, subject, body)
is much better for quickly reading code. Plus, reading the docs is hugely important. Having to check every now and then is great for getting you back into them.If it's not already painfully apparent, our current batch of representatives are completely ineligible to pass modern legislation. They're not idiots, they're not morons, they just don't have the relevant backgrounds to represent us anymore. The times have changed around them, and their skills and background are no longer effective or relevant enough.
We need to work hard to get new representatives on the hill that understand and respect technology. The only way non oppressive legislation even stands a chance is if we have representatives that understand the workings of the internet and don't say things like "let google just hire some 16 year old wiz-kid to fix it".
Seriously. It's no longer ok to be a representative and not understand the internet. It is a fundamental part of commerce, free speech, assembly, religion, education, etc. and it's outright dangerous to have people in office who don't understand it attempting to control it.
It's up to us to get relevant, modern representatives in office. We just need to work together and do it.
> Well ok, necessity is the mother of invention.
"People say it's very inhospitable. But it's the epitome of hospitality. It empowers the guest to get in and to get out."
> Wow, the irony (and sadness) are overflowing.
The only time I can really see this being more useful to me, is when I can't get a hold of my wait(er/ress) to bring the check or run my card. And here's a better idea that I'm a give you all for free. Near field communication with cellphones and a chip in the table. Open up my payment app, close and pay for the check with my cellphone. Put a few bucks tip on the table and leave like it's the old days before credit cards.
It's honestly quite shameful.
't' equals the value of 'array' at index 'm' minus 1 and 'm' equals itself minus 1.
vs 'm' equals itself minus 1.
't' equals the value of 'array' at index 'm'.
To me one of those seems more concise for writing production code, and the other more useful for teaching algorithms. t = array[--m];
Well I don't know if it trips me up so much as it makes me think too much about syntax especially when the focus is on the algorithm itself. When writing educational code I find the following more effective: m -= 1;
t = array[m];
Anyone else have any thoughts?What on earth would you be worried about? Getting asked to leave? Having to look at a police officer?
No we read the docs.
Is there any value in github for a non-programmer? Not really. There are a few esoteric repos of non code / code related files but the intended use is for easy code hosting and sharing.
There are also a lot of repos without documentation or examples. There's nothing wrong with that. They probably don't want you to use the code yet.
He himself can't respect the very laws he champions on his own public facing website.
This is more a tech news site than a code help site, but stackoverflow has a great community of people who answer code questions.
wages: http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/06/06/us-foxconn-china-i...
TLDR:
They can't bargain. Plain and simple.
We have worker protections. If all that mattered was the free market then we wouldn't need them.