465 karma · joined March 2, 2014
You have helped me so much!
The lesson is never trust the size of a company as sufficient reasoning that they can and will pay their bills.
So, so many people trying to solve this problem. This is just the flavor of the month.
Somehow it has become ingrained that a CEO's job is to build everyone up and paint the vision. Well, that's great but somewhere along the way we forgot about the basics of personnel management. Think a co-founder is taking a chance by going without a salary? How about the dude with options and a family.
Sure, people know what they are getting into when they join a startup - or should - but I yearn for YC's next class on "Startup Ethics 101".
What's the glideslope of a multirotor vehicle?
pursue flying now, you won't regret the freedom it brings.
Example. Compensation can be interpreted as "the prospect of a return favor".
like a stick of gum.
I am curious if you're a pilot and if so have your CPL or ATP.
It's not about the PPL vs. CPL (and by definition they need more than a CPL). The difference is in what might be considered "compensation". The FAA's interpretation of this is so incredibly broad, it should scare the pants off anyone considering bending the rules here, and their lawyers should have picked up on this. Did the flights with vendors increase a relationship that might further an interest or negotation later? Did the flights help them improve their app? Did it result in a prospect of a return favor?
It may not be fair or just, but the FAA put those rules out there and a whole lot of people have been inconvenienced by them. I love that Tapjets is doing this, but they moved fast and not particularly wisely. If they thought they could run like Uber and ask for forgiveness later, they never worked with the FAA.
I loved that computer