232 karma · joined March 25, 2021
(Bernie? Chomsky? DJT, only whilst on goldplated throne?)
(In another thread. seem to be selectively highlighting VC data from china to fit their agenda)
Btw, Acemoglu et al seem to be cited by the CI Jones review of Romer.
And here is what im trying to steer towards a specification of designori: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13529578
(P21-3)
P23: >[the founder] starts hiring [capital/managing upwards] today
>Disclaimer: This paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank
(But should it be interpreted likeso?)
My understanding of AirBnB may be dated to last decade when they hired some of my classmates as interns.. afai understand it, there might have been a slight chance of them getting indigestion from Design_thinking#Applications stanfordian d.school sophistry (the place where stans foorth)
Exercise: where are the engineers in the AAPL diag you linked?
(Think RAND & Systems Thinking updated for the age of quasi-Aquarius, it relatedly amusing how systems engineers are lowest status in CS depts.. below graphics!! human capital destruction yo)
Edit: perhaps you can try to explain to me how RAND has been conflated in my mind with Stanford :)
Olivier Nomellini senior fellow lol
I’d say the 5th (esp. comparison to archies) is also relevant as well as the various instances of “exec” ie the partners
[9th on the guardian mode in nerds?]
EDit: just saw that you replied to showrunning, thanks for directing my attention! I also replied to DG thread
(To my nondefence, dialect means accent in England, e,g, one would say that the young E2R spoke a Saxon dialect)
Anyways, to try & adhere to a proper division of labor (mine lot is to safely dispose of spilled ink) herewith is summarized my latest attempt at designori integration (more to unpack moving forwards)
How to effectively fund research from the bottom-up? To improve on VDH, in the horizonal Union, your research pays the hoi polloi to be entertained! It is said Mondragonese labor hires capital, can we refine (i,e, “sophisticate the sophistry”) this! Proles hire technicians who hire fonders who hire growth engineers who hire capital! Keep candidates few & condorcet becomes ideal!
(Romer & Veblen have a common thread that human capital have a tendency to be destroyed in the OC.. perhaps you’d like to reply to the hot thread on ShowRunning, while i further refine my understanding of designori in the HolyWoods)
Edit: it is my understanding that present day academia favors destruction of human capital.
>…suspected that the actual 3D chamber had no corners at all. “That sounded unbelievable,” says Domokos. “But later we found that she was right.”
Fwiw its also not obvious from the main paper, you have to look at fig 7 d-e for an idea
So in this case, i’d place some of the blame on the mathematicians themselves for failure to properly follow up on the bait. (But nature shall not be absolved from holding them to a higher standard)
I have merely tabbed item?id=41519713 from HN tail, for v vs h integration is also at the backend of my mind (the slop-schlep — measured in microyarvins? — estimate for that doesnt look good?)
*excerpt here, dont mind the slapdashed heading? https://panarchy.org/veblen/absentee.html
>Indeed, it has taken something like a hundred years for the formulas of the economists to adapt themselves to the new run of facts in business and industry which set in in the days of Adam Smith.
See esp. the penultimate (Leninist?) paragraph “…grounded in traditional common sense…” (TCS is related to conscientiousness, but very much anitithetical to Castalia) which i cant paste here due to my buggy OS
Im guessing i heard the persian story somewhere before..
Blonde is americain? The tattooed guy, alpine accent?
Designori, as in Hesse’s magnum opus
Btw, https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
(Note curious bug surfaced by morbidred)
should be great for getting YC, according to my faith-based analysis
[Nitwithstanding (as you teach) cui bono analysis would be speedier variant which gets most of the way there anyway]
pS: whenever i type on HN, im already effectively, if only metaphorically, inebriated , so the ball is in your court, as they say
(Because otherwise i’d be tilting at neoVictorian as opposed to newEdwardian windmails)
[Edit: designori/designatori as synthesis (or compromise?) of Paul Romer’s endogenous growth engineers (type ii-minus) & Veblen’s technical soviets (type i-plus)?
Especially section III https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/RomerNobel.pdf
pPs: as you understand designatori is more akin to painters than Painters, buy what about designori?]
*personally prefer the term “designists”, but YMMV on that one
https://arrowtheory.com/pub/index.html
Now we just need to figure out who JG is, because.. that conversation with EW seems to have actually taken place.
EDIT: for something less fictional (& hence less believable:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/09/240912135848.h...
“The frontier of physics is number theory.” —Peter Sarnak, deity of TFA’s locality, to be doubted since this utterance was totally public
E,g, Hamburger Enigma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carathéodory_conjecture
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41548104
(Mulling/marvelling ATM how wikipedia talkpages, mastodon, o1, or HN are all inadequate for the kind of conversations we all hope for, something about the tension between sublimating koinonia & prowess-seeking)
EDIT Getting a bit selfreferential here too https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41567018
EDIT 2: “barely bottled in-game insanity” could work
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41565859?
(Im guessing that my increasing inability to parse (& engage with) your yc-related responses could be due to your professional expertise/our mutual interests :)
[peripherally, i also find it hard to tell if adastra22 is for real real — deep & subtle silos are realer]
I agree that almost all the time its just a bunch of guys. Would you agree, though, that this time round it’s about good vs evil organizational structures?
Specifically, Apple are relevant because their designer stratum (generalizable to Jobs’ habit of reifying ICs, so that Woz enters en passant) rhymes with the intended designer culture in AirBnB (& YC if only because their current prez was designer culture raised)
Let me know if i somehow got the pulse on anything in your opinion.
Jenisch & Rotwelsch, any trace?
we had this convo earlier? Gold the precious colour of liberalism? (& of commerce and markets?) should work very well for the kray (UA/RU)
(Surely it would come after red in any hierarchy)
Return to usual programming soon :)
Huliaipole
(Capital of Makhnovshchina of the black appleteers)Maybe as long as harlot?
Regret i that i cant match the verve..
A couple of points while i absorb these tubes:
1) lyrics to wellermans apple would be a mashup of
a)
https://lyricstranslate.com/en/new-zealand-folk-wellerman-russian
&
b) (you may choose between red, black, or white (the last one is trickiest) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yablochko
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Яблочко
… thus creating a bluesky composition? (Defer to wikipedia-aproved vexillology by Nathan Evans)2) a self-policing of tone (more accurately, tint? Also note the singular red) would achieve ontopicality here
https://youtube.com/watch?v=4oB89nvdrdAEDIT: Hoist by the colors https://youtu.be/x9oN_zk_WSk
EDIT 2: https://youtu.be/XleUs-neDR8
(Feel free to add lyrics))
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20586887
down is more organic, up is more mechanical and electric; left is denser and more atmospheric, right is spikier and bouncier.