805 karma · joined October 7, 2017
I like free software a lot, and do not know much about weapon development, but would not the software reveal a lot about capabilities of the weapon platform? The argument to keep the software private might not be motivated just by attempt to hide security holes, but also by desire to hide what the weapon can do, what are the operational limits, etc.
The repository looks promising, however the build.sh trying to reach to the internet during the build is disappointing. I would expect that to not help with having reproducible results. I need to look into how distributions approach this.
So what would be the recommended way to protect against government MitM by using some obscure CA?
Well, it is not perfect, much still, the hassle is one-time, so meh.
It is pretty close to China, so in case of a war, it is not exactly great location (from US point of view).
Definitely not everywhere in the EU. My Yaris has flat mirrors.
Sooner or later you will start hitting the physical space limit of the computer case. So if one wants to stick to "single PC" setup, it might be worth just picking the largest disks available, event if slightly more expensive per GB.