193 karma · joined January 31, 2013
Now, you're not immune to workforce politics so there may still be reasons why you'd be fired but I definitely wouldn't accept it without finding out a lot more about your situation and potentially escalating the complaint.
"There's no point in making trivial adjustments, ... on a site this big and this complex, it is impossible to predict how even the smallest changes might affect the bottom line. Fixing the wonky images, for instance, might actually hurt Plenty of Fish. Right now, users are compelled to click on people's profiles in order to get to the next screen and view proper headshots."
This isn't to say that everything must be A/B tested, but it's very easy to overlook the fact you can negatively affect the site by making an apparently positive change.
I signed it in front of them (which matched my passport signature BTW) but was politely declined as they'd seen the card unsigned.
Another example of security policy getting in the way of actual security.
Secondly when you have shareholders you have to be seen to be doing things to increase value for your shareholders, and not necessarily for the long term. Raising money doesn't always coincide with making profit, so the companies would be exposing themselves to potentially hindering lawsuits (which would probably be dismissed but are definitely distracting).
There is a huge amount that banks could do to make things easier for their customers but progress seems very slow. I have a friend who works for high street banks and it sounds absolutely horrendous! Better to be safe than sorry for them though I guess.
If I get to a stage where there are enough people demanding networking then I imagine my age won't be much of a concern any more.
Would you want automatic importing from your bank account or from a table of data?