I have to zoom in and pan around like a bird pecking for crumbs.
3,418 karma · joined November 14, 2018
I have to zoom in and pan around like a bird pecking for crumbs.
Many households have two cars, one for errands and one for work/travel, so if that's true it helps on both accounts.
It brought to mind the story about the two economists who see $100 on the ground. One wants to pick it up, but the other tells him not to waste his time, because if it were real someone would have picked it up already.
Anyway what I'm getting at, is they will be a lot more open to suggesting these things when the thing is legal, both due to pure numbers of fellow enjoyers you encounter but also social factors of being open about it. Up until they get used to your change, then they might stop.
You'll sometimes see the same stuff said if someone announces they are vegetarian or made another dietary change.
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/yeast-fermentation...
"Most yeast strains can tolerate an alcohol concentration of 10–15% before being killed. This is why the percentage of alcohol in wines and beers is typically in this concentration range."
I assume temperature and other factors play a role in how successful you are at keeping them alive that long though.
I think whether it would help is somewhat complex because polymer notes do still wear out, and lower value notes have higher usage which makes them wear out faster. IIRC the main driver for polymer was security with durability as a nice side effect.
This link https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2015/sep/7.html says that median life for $5 notes is 3.5 years under one measurement system, which I would presume would be even lower for $1/$2 if we used them, since they'd get more frequent usage and less storage.
It should be possible to calculate the costs, savings, and lifetime of all the coin and note variations but that's a bit much for me right now :)
I don't think it has a direct legal basis, but like most things to do with contracts it builds the picture of intent and acceptance and understanding of what they were getting into.
If they're heavy on cosmetics, there's incentive to make the gameplay-obtained stuff worse. If they have QoL upgrades, the base experience is worse. If the cash shop exists, it's plastered all over the menus and with little annoying notifications, breaking immersion. Not to mention silly joke outfits, which generally proliferate even in serious games.
They designed Diablo 4 at a very high zoom level - my guess is this is so you focus on your character more, making you want to deck them out in cosmetics. This limited FoV makes gameplay worse.
You log in to town in PoE, instead of your hideout, where you want to spend most of your time. The players suspect this is so you see other players in their supporter pack outfits, tempting you to do the same. This is a small annoyance, but it's there, and won't be fixed.
That's from a recent article - not sure if it changed since.
https://apnews.com/article/gaming-business-children-00db669d...
They wanted a new web-based system to make it easier to onboard client work (less coding!) but picked a test case of a fairly complex client. The idea was of course some combination of them being complex enough to expose requirements, needing a rewrite anyway, and hoping they'd pay for some of it (funding the system development).
What happened in the end was a fundamental tying of the mental model of the software to this particular client - like some weird cousin of Conway's Law, the system was overly complex and complicated for the vast majority of our simpler client work because it was too strongly coupled to the business model and structure of this major client and their work. And it never got simpler, because by picking this complex one to start with, the sprints were always racing to catch up. These wounds were all entirely self inflicted.
Those little touches of personality just seem almost entirely absent from the new platform-based web.
And, perhaps most importantly - if they don't learn, they can be removed. Big difference between UI for work, and UI for fun. You can design differently for a captive audience. This can be used for both good and evil (also see: Government websites).
Also, even basic Explorer windows often lose their borders when logging in via RDP, leading to white on white mayhem, but I've always assumed that's a bug.
Personally, I think the Windows OS itself is one of the most problematic offenders. How can you expect better from third party developers, when MS uses at least 3 different UI paradigms for system settings? And F1 doesn't bring up help - it brings up a web browser!
In my case, I learned about setting up a triple-click shortcut to pop up the accessibility menu so I could unmute the phone via software due to a broken side switch that won't stay on. I'm sure this is available elsewhere online, but using Google just took me to the regular places - typically someone posting on an Apple forum trying and failing to get help.