Would antiracism interrupt black people from making a racist remark?
514 karma · joined October 6, 2015
Whether their policy was directly effective toward that end or just another layer of obtuse bureaucratic process like you describe, Twilio is signalling that they applied antiwhite ideology to their employment decisions.
The best case of your apologetics amounts to: maybe they did normal layoffs and they're just framing it in an arbitrary way so as to acknowledge woke beliefs. Which is a restatement of the virtue signalling described by the commenter above.
Looking upon your way as you travel is not surveillance. Putting a light on a night is not surveillance. We are talking about a particular thing, notwithstanding irrelevantly broad archaic or foreign usage.
Alexa, what is necklacing?
Is it conceivable that the UK government would actually interview you to protect me against itself?
Obviously the latter, therefore the content itself is held to some standard. Show me that standard, and I'll show you an ideology.
Bald-facedly denying censorship is certainly not intellectually productive, might I suggest you simply stop doing that?
No matter how clever and subtle you think you're being, you're still just redirecting the user's attention from the task at hand toward the UI itself. No matter how ignorable, dismissable, or optional it is, it's an abysmal UI failure and it shouldn't even happen once. Make the feature right in the first place and you won't have to resort to nagging.