https://proceedings.mlr.press/v137/kavalerov20a/kavalerov20a...
It turns out 2 classes is special. Better to add the classes as side information rather than try to make it part of the main objective.
155 karma · joined April 2, 2013
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v137/kavalerov20a/kavalerov20a...
It turns out 2 classes is special. Better to add the classes as side information rather than try to make it part of the main objective.
The US is the world's biggest lumber producer and Canada is often #2 as far as I can tell.
I'm a woodworker and this movie from 1964 was fascinating. At one point it said 'one day the 16" board will be a museum piece' and I just laughed because it is too true! The only non-composite boards I have seen that wide are $100s of dollars per foot and have such funky grain, checking, cracking, or splitting that I'm sure would have been ripped down by traditional pre-industrial revolution carpenters.
Would be good to see if it is worth upgrading x4 and x8 setups.
Single gpu upgrade being worth it is a no-brainer. Launch price of the 30xx cards is lower that then purchase-able price of the two comparison cards!
If only you could buy them though. The only microcenter in PA got 15 of each 30xx on respective launch days.
If anyone knows how many of these cards are being produced please do share.
When linear B was decoded the first thing many researchers did was to transcribe every word they could get their hands on, then sort by beginnings and endings of words [2]. I suppose that is what the poster has done since they say there are no inflected word endings, but perhaps a cipher hides these, or they do not have enough data?
[1]: http://www.turkicresearch.com [2]: https://medium.com/@ilyakavalerov/greek-before-homer-how-lin...
I think other commenters are correct when they say HMMs and linear regression made them much of their money in the 90's. I wrote an article [0] summarizing this.
But it is always tempting to think they must be doing something esoteric and mystical at Medallion. A part of me thinks that when interviewed the employees of Medallion say they do whatever simple XYZ technique from quantopian.com/lectures just so that the reporter with a distant memory of HS math leaves them alone. Another part of me does believe that you can do simple things at scale and still make money.
[0]: https://medium.com/@ilyakavalerov/the-man-who-solved-the-mar...
It also depends what community you ask, engineers vs mathematicians vs actual statisticians. So the community you want to be a part of is the one you should ask. It is probably too much of a melting pot here to get one of these flavors.
In my past I’ve looked at courses I wanted to take, and then looked at the chain of prerequisites and books used there, hws assigned, and did those. Nothing beats talking to the teachers who you think are good. Alternatively you could have colleagues who you like, and whose history you want to emulate.
Having a specific goal is important. Egregious amounts of time can be spent in many corners of probability theory and statistics. Especially in the case that steps are taken in the wrong order. Trying to do Billingsley without first taking real analysis would be crazy. And maybe studying from Billingsley is crazy for most people’s goals to begin with.
That said, I’ve enjoyed reading the suggestions here.
What are your thoughts/interests on analysis for ML, like the approximation theory that branched from Fourier and Wavelet analysis catching on with Cybenko [1], continuing with among others Mhaskar [2], most recently added to by Bolcskei [3]. And then there are other areas where analysis applies like studying the optimization of such networks...
(And of course, this is just for NNs. There are other areas of research where analysis comes into ML. And of course, real analysis lays the foundations for probability and statistics, and is not abstracted away in many research areas in these fields.)
[1](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/05ce/b32839c26c8d2cb38d5529...) [2](https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/694a/d455c119c0d07036792b80...) [3](https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.01714)
^^^ What? The opposite of this is the mainstream I thought. The promise of DL is to learn hierarchical models of your data. The network learns edge filters, learns combinations of edge filters that differentiate an eye vs a nose, but doesn't learn combinations of intermediate features that determine a face? ppl usually say with a deep enough network an hierarchical concept can be learned...
with: http://imgur.com/a/Sne89
I sort of see what you mean since NNs transport information across a graph in a straightforward (non-loopy) way, and PGMs can propagate information in crazy (neverending loops) ways when doing belief propagation...
How many data points per graph? Really just 1 median salary a year (20x2 data points and 1k^2 pixels :)? I would have preferred just points with straight lines over the interpolated wavy line that looks fibbed. Why not more points? Why not a heat map/2d histogram instead of medians? And why not have the same axis on all the graphs?