I imagine meta wants to make it easy to connect to "your" account in the same house if you have multiple devices.
54 karma · joined January 6, 2013
I imagine meta wants to make it easy to connect to "your" account in the same house if you have multiple devices.
There is also GNU unifont [1] "The original intent of Unifont was to offer a simple font format with wide Unicode coverage to render something meaningful for each Unicode code point"
Discussion at the time (featuring very similar privacy concerns): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33421751
Small bug report: when editing the dropdown, current entries have "API Name" disabled (this is normal), but the value is changend automatically when editing the "Display name". The page errors out (400 error for UpdateObject).
When using devtools and editing "API Name" to stay the same, everything works.
That would be kinda cool or am I misunderstanding something?
We resolved it by pointing clients to use google dns.
Never had similar problems with .com
Seems like it's the same as the M1 MacBook Air and Pro.
> This iPhone would never be able to boot iOS again, as its nvme nand is completely dead.
As a customer really it seems they talk a lot about privacy yet implements "sneaky" changes like this, it seems a bit dishonest.
1. I know the feature is a different in IOS (it only disconnects connected devices) but for location services/tracking this is effectively the same as android. see: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208086
I agree it is still reasonable but I feel that a limited release would be better as a subscription for a single film is pretty dumb IMO.
As for the regulations I agree that they are too strict for the digital age but not releasing in the theaters is a pretty bad solution IMO.
I read two physical books this year (~25 on kindle).
I read a lot of books at the same time so I find e-readers to be very convenient because I don't have to carry a lot of books as I used to do before.
EDIT: clarification
I read a lot with one hand and I couldn't make the switch to the paperwhite because of its weight (I read quite a bit with my brother's one, you can definitely feel the difference).
I still agree that the Oasis is really expensive. It's really a shame because it's designed for my favorite use case.
The only brower I've tried that manages to get a page is firefox[1]
The main issue for me is the weight of the device: 206g for the paperwhite and 170 for my older kindle (according to the amazon website).
Is this difference really noticeable? Is it still possible to read with one hand?
Brings lots of memories, I used to make flash games in school when I was 15. I always liked those little games. /nostalgia
ps: not trolling but I gave to my grandma a linux laptop (ubuntu and unity) and I think it's always great to have alternatives
Plus you don't want to play on a 13 inches screen, let's be realistic.
Not to mention that "clutering" desk with a full keyboard, a good mouse and a bigger screen will still be needed.