742 karma · joined December 3, 2025
Gensler spent his entire time at the SEC doing exactly that type of adjudication.
We scraped the entire internet but our business might not be viable if we get scraped too.
"We incorporate open-source software in our models, platform, and applications, which may subject us to litigation or other requirements, each of which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations."
We violated GPL.
"We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have misappropriated the intellectual property of other companies, particularly as we hire employees from other AI and technology companies."
We sniped employees from other labs that brought over IP.
The whole risk section is insane frankly.
If it gets swept you are breached.
Good time to start a company that builds giant Faraday cages over data centers.
What good are strong cryptography primitives for cryptocurrency if your "CEO" can successfully make calls to reorganize the chain?
Do some nice nostalgia marketing for the zoomers and people that had one back in the day and it would sell like hotcakes.
It gives away the game entirely, they want regulatory capture and the politicians boosting it want millions in donations from the IPOs, there's big money in this type of AI grifting.
The SEC should heed the AI labs own warnings and forbid any AI lab doing doom marketing from doing an IPO, for safety of course.
If you want to comfortably afford this gen you had to trade options on memory stocks...