ioteg

> Perhaps it's because he characterizes people with autism as subhuman?

Has this actually happened? I didn’t find anything on Google.

Why should we limit oil imports and consumption?

Most people where I live, even the poorest, can afford to own a car and almost all of them do. It’s regulations that are making car ownership impossible for those people. It’s the government that is a bourgeois enemy of the people.

This is not true. ULEZ already exist and are mandatory from the EU in several cities of my country. (If your city has a population of more than X, you must implement a ULEZ.) People with 15 year old diesel cars can no longer drive in those cities. Exactly the same people who can't afford to change their cars. We are not talking “vintage” cars. We are talking poor people cars.

Nobody is "irrationally scared" of EVs. We are rationally scared that, once enough well-off people have switched to EVs, this market share will be used as an excuse to stop poor people from driving their petrol or diesel cars. ("Rationally" because this is already happening.)

Into compliance? Compliance of what? Also why do you want draconian measures to push consumers to buy? Shouldn't you let consumers buy whenever they can afford to change their cars? What kind of draconian measures are you thinking of, emission regulations that make it impossible for poor people to drive their cars?

You mean some asshole asked your parents for that sum to not go to a trial that they would lose and your parents paid.

First paragraph is about regulating US companies. It doesn’t affect the interests of the EU oligarchs.

Both parties are exactly the same thing.

Computers and copyright are fairly recent in Spain and Italy? This is astonishingly ignorant, if not simple ragebait.

Most people don’t go to the university to learn, they go to get a diploma. If you don’t pay tuition they will not give you a diploma.