888 karma · joined March 10, 2011
By that logic, even just 3 hours a day would be 150 GB down a month.
The idea of comparing insurance isn't new, but I felt that no one had done it well. Generally, either the results are biased because someone is trying to encourage you to pick one company over the other. Or when an agency is able to show you accurate, official prices - they are not able to show it for all of the largest companies, which results in an incomplete comparison.
With Leaky, we've set out to change that by being as impartial and transparent as possible - because we think that people deserve to be able to compare and manage their insurance the way they want to.
Gets a bit weird around here though: "Intelligent people are more likely to be nocturnal because humans are designed to wake up when the sun comes up and go to sleep when the sun goes down. They are more likely to be homosexual, because humans are evolutionarily designed to reproduce heterosexually. They are more likely to enjoy instrumental music because music in its evolutionary origin was vocal, and they are more likely to consume alcohol, cigarettes and drugs because all of these substances are evolutionarily novel."
Through Leaky, one of the things that we've always liked is that there's room for disruption in all parts of the spectrum. Customer acquisition, retention, quoting, pricing, binding, billing, etc ad nauseum. You can even decide if you want it to be B2C or B2B.
For us, we've focused on 1) simplifying the comparing and ultimately the purchasing of personal lines insurance (auto, home, life) and 2) creating a real-time (truly real-time; not the "we'll call you back in 5 minutes" model) commercial insurance comparison and purchasing platform.
There are a lot of headaches to disrupting insurance as an industry, namely there are a lot of regulations and a lot of litigious parties. However, our view is that mounting public frustration (for all forms of insurance) and the current lack of software-based solutions make insurance a ripe industry for disruption.
The only thing we need to do this is just to have the e-mail address that you used on leaky.com and we'll do the rest. So _please_ email us at sayhi at leaky dot com so that we can correct your results.
Also, _please_ email us at sayhi at leaky dot com with the email address you used on the site so that we can look into it; that difference is well outside of the norm.
EDIT: Thanks for emailing us and including screenshots. As discussed, we've already identified a few issues (we blame Geico's website), and have added it to the list of test cases for further testing.
We run lots of randomized test cases for our accuracy, if your prices have been off by more than 3% - please email us at sayhi@leaky.com with the email address you used on the site. We'll (anonymously) add you to our test cases.
Accuracy is a big focus for us; for example, when we added Esurance, it tested within a 1% margin of error in 87% of cases, and within a 2% margin in most of the rest. (We'll be releasing our accuracy data in a later post!)
Thanks for the feedback too, it sounds like something that we're working on to allow users to fold their information into our routine accuracy testing - which should be helpful for them and us.
If you're in California (the only state that we officially support), we're within 1% in about 50% of cases and within 3% in about 80% of cases - and we're always getting better. However, there are still occasional outliers that we are always trying to identify and fix.
If you're outside California, well - the prices will be different. However, the magnitude changes (eg for switching cars) will be similar to what you would see in your state.
As for the occupation discounts - those come straight from the insurers' filed documents.
However, there's almost always a statistical analysis for the decisions that they make and it may have nothing to do with driving record. It might be that one profession stays with the insurer longer or is a more profitable customer by allowing the insurer to insurer multiple-lines for them (house, life, etc.).
(Insurers shouldn't care if you had an accident and weren't at fault - their models say that should not affect your price, which is why we only ask for 'at-fault accidents')