jkahn

The hard part of the MyGov platform is the inter-department stuff, and I don't think that's a software issue, that's bureaucracy.

MyGov isn't perfect, but it's fine.

Many years ago, I tried a remote VA. I'm on my second in-person EA. I've tried delegating a lot of different stuff - some works, some doesn't.

In no particular order:

* Remote VA. Don't even bother. They're of limited usefulness and it will come down to more work in communication for you in the end. They don't know your local environment, city, employees, customers.

* Personality. You want someone that's competent, smart and capable, but also humble. Would you be proud to have them talk to your best client to reschedule a meeting - would it be a great customer service experience? Do they make people feel welcome and offer them coffee? Is nothing beneath them - they're just as willing to put coffee cups in the dishwasher as well as update a spreadsheet? You want a great, friendly attitude and competence.

* Trust. You have to trust them. This depends on them as well as you: will they do the right thing? They will require time to figure out what your preferences are. It's unfair to expect them to read your mind. You need to coach them on that. But they also need to have an innate sense of what good looks like.

* Some things delegate well and some don't. Especially some personal items. An EA is ace at scheduling a 12 person meeting, venue, lunch, catering, and making sure it suits you. But it's a pain in the ass to get them to update your auto insurance, because they won't have authority on your account and it's such a pain to get it.

* Letting go of the small stuff. Do you care about exactly what kind of wine a client gets as a gift? That's hard to delegate time effectively. Or is it a price range and the EA's choice? Much easier. Similarly with scheduling meetings. You need to give your EA carte blanche on your calendar - within the expectations you agree. I don't do meetings before 9am or after 4pm. But within that, she is fine to schedule what is needed.

* Training yourself. You need to learn to use an EA if you haven't had one before. Surprisingly, this takes a while. It's much harder to delegate control your personal items - including your calendar - than delegating other items. You might think that because you have staff you're already ace at delegation, but this is different. You're actually giving up some personal choices in order to get more time. It was also much harder for me to ask someone to go out and buy X gift for my wife urgently than to delegate other functions. But you get used to it.

Hope that helps. Overall EA's are a massive time saver and make some administrative tasks just disappear. Really valuable for me.

I'm very interested to hear from people that have had positive LASIK experiences or even an ICL procedure done. So far on this thread it's mostly negative.

I think you sum it up well - there are some rough edges in the Windows world, but there also are in the Mac world. I find I hardly use my iPad now.

If all you need to do is plain text email, sure, Mutt is fine. If you deal with a large amount of email, calendar appointments, tasks, contacts, etc, in a professional role, nothing beats Outlook.

There's a reason it's so popular.

Your products are definitely on the very high end of price when it comes to clothing. Do people buy expensive clothes from a brand they've never heard of online? Maybe you're better suited to a bricks and mortar store so people can touch and feel the product, without the heft of a well known brand behind you. If not a store, then supplying other stores.

The discounting strikes me with cognitive dissonance. You're trying to sell a premium product - why would you discount? Personally I'd never buy clothes that were this expensive outside of a premium suit. I am a purchaser of other premium products, though. Look at what the brands you want to imitate do. Do they discount? Do they do run out sales? Better to just change your price if you didn't pick the right one. If someone's looking for a discount, they're probably after a $20 sweater, not s $500 one.

100% capitalism isn't practical and is unfair (e.g, to the poor and sick). What is a fair way to divide costs for road usage: time of use, miles driven, emissions, cost of vehicle, ability to pay? It's not an easy answer, and many are practically unenforceable. Hence, tax.

And for the record: I'm generally capitalist by economic viewpoint.

If industry X was paying $100mm tax, and industry Y disrupts and replaces that, while paying only $20mm tax, the government needs to find $80 million to replace that tax shortfall.

Nothing to do with taxi related services...

I think this is going to happen anyway, as it's not just Facebook. Governments see it as a reduction in tax, and it's politically safe for a Government to do without getting voted out.

This isn't limited to Facebook, as the article explains. The issue and background here is that when large companies operate globally, each country has its own local subsidiary, owned by the global entity. Money is made in each country by selling goods or services. How are the profits sent upstream to the parent company? By charging costs for goods; or license fees for services. As the company chooses their own costs and license fees, they can effectively control in which entity they make a profit and which they don't. This is also how companies shift profits to no- or low- tax jurisdictions. See: Apple and their large amounts of cash held outside of the USA.

With increased globalisation, this is an issue for many countries. In Australia, for example (where I live), the roll out and success of Uber means that the taxi company tax base will erode. If Uber shifts profits overseas, the Australian Government gets less tax but still has to provide the same level (or greater) services. Uber's a better service, we want it to succeed, but tax is needed for necessary services.

While companies continue to do this, the answer is information sharing between countries' tax offices and laws to ensure a certain amount of profits must stay on-shore, while not dis-incentivising multi-nationals from doing business in each country. As this already has political attention, I'd expect laws in most major countries to deal with this over the next 5 years.

But Facebook are taking the piss here.

I'm also totally happy to continue to pay. I'm sure we're not in the minority.

Central auth, auto certificate deployment, encryption by default. The nice bits are Windows only unfortunately.

Very little information on your site, though. Some questions strike me:

- What path does the money take from the customer to the user of your service (e.g. me), and how long does it take to get there?

- What kind of backing/insurance/licenses do you have? If you're a tiny startup, there's risk for users of your system if you go bust and any money in transit disappears.

Large companies I deal with don't rent physical machines, they buy them and then run a hypervisor platform across them to gain some of the availability benefits of an infrastructure cloud. It costs more, but you lower your risk profile. Many of these companies are looking at migrating their apps to a cloud platform (internal or external) to outsource the hardware / software / infrastructure maintenance. They are mostly interested in IaaS.

Cloud is not just for Internet hipsters.