jppittma

The only way I can see that happening is with an EEE model. You'd go grab all of the non-steam publishers and come up with a standard format that'd mean that studios can push to every platform in a standardized way, then bank on nobody bothering to install steam because the app store already has all of the games you want, and it's installed by default.

More money is spent/made made on iOS gaming than on traditional PC gaming, even if the $60 up front model isn't something iOS users are willing to accept. I almost think they're right to tolerate mtx models btw. At least if games are f2p, companies aren't releasing them broken/unfinished.

My macbook sleeps fine, with a battery life of roughly 18 hours.

That’s the idea. I try set it up so the time I spend on the idea in the doc is proportional to its viability.

Do good non-doc-worthy work => Get doc-worthy work => Write doc => Get promo

Google is a huge company with ~180,000 employees. Sometimes people do sensible things.

My experience has been that the second one means, "I need to communicate with my team/TL what I'm doing/how I'm solving this problem." Eventually, when you go for promotion, you take documents in category 2, and add enough context to them that they become category one.

We do "one-pagers" if there's basically one, simple, straight forward way to do something; however, I'm with google on this one.

If you're designing something, and there's only a single solution under consideration, either there's no design, or you're not being thorough. Choices and tradeoffs are what make design

I don't know if or not this is "coherent," but my experience has been that the type of person to oppose something like this is more often than not the type of person we were trying to filter out anyway. There may be some false negatives of course, but in terms of keeping the klan from high positions in your institution, this sort of thing seems to work.

I think people have collectively decided that they want their programs stupid and predictable, rather than smart and unwieldy.

There is almost certainly so much network virtualization going on your head would spin.

A is a vowel

As far as I can tell, Rust _does_ support dynamic linking. You can both compile rust code to .so and link against existing shared objects. What are you talking about?

>The compiler supports various methods to link crates together both statically and dynamically. This section will explore the various methods to link crates together, and more information about native libraries can be found in the FFI section of the book.

https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/linkage.html

I don't see it as a flag that optionally takes an argument, but rather a flag that makes an optional argument mandatory.

If you come up with a model that works like that, then I think that would be worth discussing after you collect your Turing award.

That makes sense to me. If you use GPL code to train your model, then everything that model produces is a derivative work of that GPL code.

They will encourage animal cruelty if the alternative is veganism.

Working at google is like this, where no matter how much you try to do the right thing you're always under attack.

See, policy like this I wish we had in the U.S., where the government controls industry, not the other way around.

FaaS is an abstraction over a (several) managed k8s clusters. Like most abstractions, you're trading convenience for power/flexibility.

I guarantee you that for most flaws you find in the product, somebody knew about it and cared about it, but fixing it didn't make the chopping block for the release.

Oh, is this like a paid version of pandoc?

> Yes, that's why you need to organize. That stops the race to the bottom. This is exactly why strike breakers are looked down upon and why companies used to bring in 'scabs' to break strikes. To push that race to the bottom that much further.

Funnily enough, what he's describing is called "price fixing" and is illegal. The "race to the bottom" is competition keeping prices low for consumers and is a feature, not a bug.

No, they're replacing compiler engineers with data scientists.

If only they didn’t chose 1 based array indexing, like matlab. Having worked with matlab and for that reason I can’t seem to take them seriously.

Hiring committee at google knows none of your demographic information. They never see your face, and make their hiring decision based on the written feedback from interviews. Diversity in this case meant bringing more diverse candidates into the pipeline, rather than lowering criteria for acceptance.

Bazel has this functionality.

https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker#rust_image

My only hope is that when our republic finally does follow in the footsteps of Rome and become an empire that we at least have a decent administration.

My impression is that it's not people paying for Youtube Premium who are complaining about Google targeting people with ad blockers. I suppose Netflix used to offer only paid, ad free video streaming, so it isn't really out of the question for somebody to wish that were youtube's model; however, I can't help but imagine that if YouTube said they were switching to that most people on this site would be even more upset.

What is the basis for assuming that something like this was created in bad faith?