It seems a bit confusing from the title vs the post:
214 in favor of Jenkins is what the original post says.
Also mentioned is "Jenkins is not Oracle's project, nor CloudBee's
project, nor my project, nor Kohsuke's project - it's the community's
project, and it's going to thrive."
<quote>
"The vote is closed, and the results are in. More than half of the total
votes were from ineligible voters, but the result would have been the same
either way. The final result of all eligible votes is as follows: 214 votes
to rename, and 14 for the status quo. You can see the individual votes at
https://groups.google.com/group/hudson-jenkins-vote.
So what does this mean now? Well, it means Jenkins lives. We've registered
jenkins-ci.org, though it's empty at the moment. In the coming days, we will
be renaming the existing Google Groups to jenkins-@googlegroups.com,
renaming the Twitter account from @hudsonci to @jenkinsci, and renaming our
organization at Github from hudson to jenkinsci. I wanted to make sure
everyone had notice ahead of time that this was happening, so that no one
gets surprised by changes to their incoming mail, etc. As said before, the
initial, interim governance board will consist of me, Kohsuke and, if he and
Oracle are willing, Winston. If Winston is unwilling or unable to continue
in that role with Jenkins, we will select a replacement interim member. The
interim board will work on the details of a more permanent governance
process going forward. Discussions on the infrastructure changes (including
things like the Maven groupId/artifactIds, etc) will be in public, on these
lists. We're working to get the JIRA and wiki contents migrated over to the
Jenkins site, and hope to work with Oracle to get that done in the next
couple days.
Putting aside logistics, I want to personally thank everyone for voting, and
especially thank everyone who voted for renaming for supporting the Jenkins
project and its future. Jenkins is not Oracle's project, nor CloudBee's
project, nor my project, nor Kohsuke's project - it's the community's
project, and it's going to thrive. " *</quote>
I fail to understand why would someone change names for an established 'brand'.
(there are deserving candidates that do need a name change - Go, Closure and few hu la la from Google)