And if you're not catching N levels up but catching at each level, then you are emulating error values but with try/catch blocks.
5,658 karma · joined September 3, 2013
And if you're not catching N levels up but catching at each level, then you are emulating error values but with try/catch blocks.
The difference really becomes apparent when trying to debug a customer's problem at 3am (IME).
Pretty simple and probably quite effective if true.
https://tinygo.org/docs/reference/microcontrollers/
A few ESP32s on there.
"The Complete Memoirs of George Sherston" by Siegfried Sassoon. (Ignore the title, it's actually his autobiography, and you could probably skip the first book in the trilogy).
"Goodbye to all that" by Robert Graves.
Two of the best writers in the English language recounting their times in the trenches.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-family-link-that-reac...
If you're ever visiting the Lake District, NW England, I recommend the unexpectedly interesting Pencil Museum in Keswick. Graphite was first mined nearby and when it was realised it could be used for pencils, it became extremely valuable, requiring armed guards for its transportation. Thus Keswick claims to be the birthplace of the modern pencil.
This:
1. explains Brooks' assertion that adding coders to a late project makes it later
2. emphasises the importance in clearly defining interfaces between components, interfaces being the "paths of communication" between the coders of those components.
So your assertion is well founded.
The idea is about 10 years old. At least that's when I first heard about it, with relation to RSS. It may go back earlier.
Edit: confirmed by the "See Also" section at the end of TFA.
But then I'm replying to @mr_toad so you probably knew that already.
Here's an interesting excerpt from the Siege of Orleans though:
the struggle by which the unconscious heroine of France, in the beginning of the fifteenth century, rescued her country from becoming a second Ireland under the yoke of the triumphant English.
That's quite a statement from a 19thC English man.
I'm in my 60s and retiring this summer. I feel the opposite. Agents have removed most of the satisfaction and fulfilment from designing, building, testing and completing a feature or component. And if frameworks are a problem, learning to create simply and efficiently without them has its own sense of satisfaction.
Maybe it's a question of expectations. I suspect weavers felt the same with the arrival of mechanised looms in the industrial revolution. And it may be that future coders learn to get their fulfilment otherwise using agents.
I can absolutely see the attraction to business of agents and they may well make projects viable that weren't previously. But for this Luddite, they have removed the joy.
shuffles papers
"Hang on ... it's here somewhere ..."
In a software context, I wonder what the impact of the language used is on the sense of "resistance"?
Edit: I believe the same applies for step-parent/child.
I would prefer the term "share". "Give away" implies a single, proprietary enterprise could acquire and control it, which isn't "open source".