2,834 karma · joined September 7, 2018
i always sell my apple products. i usually get at least 50% back on what i paid.
there are caveats to passkeys thou.
zero issues since.
> The problem stems from nefarious groups getting a hold of email addresses and running distributed dictionary attacks.
years back my email was leaked by a website that i never visited. apparently someone signed up using my email address and the website never verified the email.
in the meantime more and more people used the same email address [0] to signup everywhere (it’s not the same person, i checked).
[0] gmail ignores dots in usernames: https://support.google.com/mail/answer/7436150?hl=en#:~:text....
at this point my emails should be random hashes@random hash domain
the “safety” in “AI Safety” isn’t what you think it is. it’s homeland security, not labour/societal security.
i have been using passkeys on apple since they launched it. i have also converted all of my 2fa’s to passkeys (where supported) or enabled them as password alternatives. a lot of website support passkeys nowadays. i never encountered what the author encountered and it seems like something seriously wrong happened.
did anyone encounter this issue? is it logged somewhere?
i seriously considered dropping passwords completely for future projects, but it looks like there are still issues…
any link for the crime claim?
i checked multiple websites, and while hard to measure, London as a whole is not even in the top 10 european cities when it comes to crime.
is this site complaining about 3rd party analytics?
there is also a table further down that shows various banks sharing data with… themselves? citibank will share data with citibank, and first direct (aka hsbc) will obviously share data with hsbc.
can someone explain what this article is actually about?
went again in february this year. 3 guys checking passports of hundreds of travellers. another 1.5hrs wasted.
meanwhile back in london i just scan my passport and go thru the automated gates. why can’t the US solve this issue? is it unions? is it federal government? what’s going on?
can someone please think of the children?
a bit more seriously:
1. are there any studies into the harms of cigarettes vs harms of tiktok lite/social media?
2. does the DSA’s “risk assessment” cover risks to EU users only or EU businesses as well?
3. are there any steps taken to make sure we won’t have politicians abuse the DSA to target unfriendly companies? specifically forbidding of micro managing various features and products by the politicians of the day? or is the DSA exactly this?
i’m going to burst your bubble here, but most voters have no idea about policies or candidates. most voters vote based on inertia or minimal cues, not on policies or candidates.
i suggest you look up “The American Voter”, “The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?” and “American National Election Studies”.
not really: https://www.statista.com/chart/26773/profitability-developme...
> Since the beginning of 2017, the streaming service has generated a positive net balance in eight quarters, two of them in 2021.
https://newsroom.spotify.com/2024-01-24/the-dma-means-a-bett...
they pushed hard for apple to open up in order push more ads.
the services revenue is at an all time high and keeps climbing:
https://www.statista.com/chart/amp/14629/apple-services-reve...
re. app store, the EU market represents just 7% of their worldwide app store revenues, most probably due to the fact the EU market is 65% android:
https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/01/apple-says-eu-represents-7...
https://www.statista.com/statistics/639928/market-share-mobi....
you can make a point that charging drivers will impact the poor a lot more then others.
and another point you can make is that if anyone was actually interested in pollution then wouldn’t it have been better to restrict usage directly?
yes.
> What if they only use the old platform once a week? What if they only use the new platform once a week, but that's when an important discussion happens?
you’re describing low usage.
we tried to do it differently. it was impossible. every company had it’s own extensions on top of the standards because the standards were poor. those extensions only worked when chatting with someone on the same network using the same software. this was not sustainable. when we removed those standards we not only provided an incredible experience for the user but we also removed huge amounts of code that made everything much faster.
the casualty was interoperability.
i understand what you're writing and i agree. but in my case all our enterprise clients were demanding features that had us circumventing interoperability since the features they were asking for would never make it into the standards.
i think you're romanticising things.
the whole situation with interoperability was not sustainable, as evidenced by the fact that it was dropped by every player as soon as possible.
one of the reasons why it was not sustainable was that the standards at that time were conceived for a different era, and everyone wanted special features not available in the standards.
it does seem like we're having much better success with interoperability nowadays, but only because the standards are much better today.
if you run safari and store all your passwords using icloud “passwords”, safari will automatically prefill the 2fa code. i assume this is the case for other browsers as well?