2,396 karma · joined April 23, 2012
There is a large Venn space here with RDD, résumé driven development.
we should just drop means testing of services
> extra resources for schools in poor areas
more funding != better outcomes. Parental involvement is what drives outcomes. If you don't have parents around, nothing matters.
Congrats on the round!
I don't believe the Garmin tracks apnea signals or heart issues at all unfortunately
Having an out-of-the-box admin interface means business people can operationalize and workaround short comings of the software today, not tomorrow. I think functional admin interfaces can often be the difference between a successful company and one which is constantly operating off of spreadsheets in the background and never fully commits to their software.
Yup, we sure can, but we have to be willing to talk and need to dispense with the notion that "people shouldn't discuss politics". I firmly believe the opposite, we should very much discuss it. The more we discuss it, the more civil the discussions become, not less.
“Grooming” is just breaking down things from there. Sprint planning is a formality. Ten-fifteen minutes.
I guess my point is you’re right, the rituals aren’t important in a high context team. The work is really figuring out what you’re building. Like really really figuring it out.
edit: well according to: https://ourworldindata.org/world-population-update-2022
it'll be 2083 (!) before we peak in population
An imperfect world is not an excuse for inaction
Matz wants a principal of least surprise. That doesn't mean _your_ least surprise as a non-Ruby programmer, or someone with passing familiarity with the language. It means the least surprise of someone who has worked with the language for years. What Matz has said is that C++ continues to surprise him years and years in, and he _didn't_ want that to be the case for Ruby.
Anyway, keto is great. I wasn’t terribly overweight and lost 19lbs in 9 weeks with it with a cheat day included. It’s great because it’s a very simple set of very few rules. It’s easy to adhere to because it removes moment decision making around whether or not you “should” or “deserve” to have X food. It’s nearly impossible for you to eat enough calories to maintain your current weight on keto when you’re already overweight. Therefore a deficit is nearly guaranteed therefore weightless is guaranteed. On top of all that you do get better at burning fat and don’t get as hungry.
The counterpoint is the tough piece - how do you come off that diet and reenter the real world where people eat carbs. How can you get pizza with friends, etc. I understand their are some who view keto as a lifestyle, good for them but most people aren’t going to do that.
Beyond the simple reality of calories are calories, none of this other stuff around fat vs protein vs carbs is really very hard to understand. Simple carbs are rocket fuel, they provide a lot of energy over a very short period of time. If you’re not going to use it, once the sugar saturates your blood, the excess will be taken out and stored. Then you’ll get hungry again. Fats are slower burning, so it’s harder for you to saturate your blood quickly.
This is an over simplification obviously but this is just not so hard to understand that it needs to be an endless debate over or be positioned as controversial in order to sell books.
1. Losing weight can and often will fix your diabetes. 2. Be conscious of the method you choose for weight loss, when you obtain your goal weight - what will you do long term?