430 karma · joined June 9, 2025
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
What I want to say is that I've seen what happens in a team with a history of quick fixes and inadequate architecture design to support the complex features. In that case, a proper bugfix could create significant rework and QA.
It's also great if you move frequently, or travel a lot.
And since you also know that the taiwanese want to "maintain status quo", it's probably clear to you that they want to keep their full control, and not be under the rule of the CCP.
Which makes it really interesting, why you keep argueing for "one china".
This map should show the areas of actual rule and control (de facto) and don't accept any territory to belong to a state just because they claim sovereignty.
EDIT: Think also about webgl1/2, webgpu, webxr, websocket, webrtc, webauthn ...
Most people just don't want to hear, don't want to know. And people know it, so people don't say what they think.
When you have the systems for censorship, they will eventually be used for anything the powerful wants to accomplish.
How will success be measured for this reform?
EDIT: In the context of infinite pixel tweaking, layout tweaking, and of course, new features that would require significant full stack rework