I'm not going to say her insights are universal for everyone, but it might help you understand why you like that grid you like.
612 karma · joined November 7, 2010
https://landedstar.com/blog/
I'm not going to say her insights are universal for everyone, but it might help you understand why you like that grid you like.
It reminds me of Paul Graham's old essay on PR firms, which unintentionally(?) contained the best advertisement for the NYT I've ever read.
> At the other extreme are publications like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. Their reporters do go out and find their own stories, at least some of the time. They'll listen to PR firms, but briefly and skeptically. We managed to get press hits in almost every publication we wanted, but we never managed to crack the print edition of the Times.
That said it's always a good idea in general to live below your means, and to be specific, not get the biggest mortgage your lender thinks you can afford.
"I have become a forgotten employee for a few months at my job. I want to start a new job and wondering legal ramifications."
https://www.reddit.com/r/BestofRedditorUpdates/comments/xzq4...
It argues that consciousness evolved out of sensation, where we developed an "inner self" to predict how sensations would affect us, and it's that inner self that became our conscious.
Don't miss out on the comments section, the author answers a lot of question in there.
I read some of Vol 2, Seminumerical Algorithms, to hone my instincts on how random numbers work in practice. I have referred to it on occasion when people say things like, "if we seed the random number generator, take the random number, then feed that into the seed, the result would be more random."
I read most of Vol 3, Sorting and Searching, when applying for jobs. It was more interesting than leetcode grinding. I don't know if it was more useful, but it was better for my sanity.
## coding analysis
function lines_coded {
perl -ne'print unless /^\s*$/ || /^\s*(?:#|\/\*|\*)/' $* | wl
}
function lines_commented {
perl -ne'print if /^\s*(?:#|\/\*|\*)/' $* | wl
}
And wl is just a small alias (because I used it all the time): wl='wc -l'My favorite is on "Time, Clocks and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System", where he applies the lessons of special relativity to understand computers, and he says:
> Jim Gray once told me that he had heard two different opinions of this paper: that it's trivial and that it's brilliant. I can't argue with the former, and I am disinclined to argue with the latter.
And 14 years later America is now watching "Old Enough!" on Netflix.
There was a study on this, UML in practice by Marian Petre. http://oro.open.ac.uk/35805/8/UML%20in%20practice%208.pdf where she interviewed 50 developers across 50 companies. Here's what she found.
- 50 interviews.
- 35 people don't use it.
- 11 use it selectively, just whatever is useful.
- 3 use it just once in a project, to generate code.
- 1 uses it to comply with customer or management requirements.
- 0 use it fully.
Perl is very well thought out, in a way that I don't think gets enough credit. For example, the three loop controls (next, last, redo) are four letters long, which makes remembering them easier. In a world where I sometimes have to jump between languages I haven't used in a while, and I'm always forgetting what arbitrary word choice this particular language used for a feature, it's nice to come back to Perl and have a language where the grammar is a little bit less arbitrary.
(Bonus tip: buy an international edition on eBay. It's the same content.)
[0] - me