285 karma · joined December 14, 2017
Beeple did just that.
But, I get what you're saying. There is a verification process to traditional art as well. You cannot simply impersonate Banksy and call Sotheby's, they need to verify you are actually Banksy.
I really think if there was one thing we got right - that’s money as a civilization. What we need to do is fix the loop holes. That includes taxes, corporation as persons, the whole 2011 movement of Occupy Wall Street.
a has a larger aperture than c, s, C, S, e, etc.
f, t have unusually sharp overhangs but that's the style you're going for. I am not a fan of IBM's Plex's sharp corners either because it ruins the texture of the font. Either make all corners tight or not. Their argument is "Machine + Humans" or "Tight corners + Soft curves" but your eyes don't give a shit about those things.
a's tail is too long
A, V have a massive opened corners (usually done for small size readability) but Z, X, Y's crotch doesn't. You need consistency here.
Double-story g is hard to justify in a font based on drafting templates and generally doesn't feel like it fits into this type of a typeface. However, its ok to take some liberty here.
Fitting needs work first. S's side bearings need to be cut down by a lot. o, c, e's fitting is much larger than it should be.
There is a lot of work to be done here. I am pretty grumpy generally so don't take this too seriously. Have fun and hope you're enjoying the process!
Typographers struggle to make a living in most cases, but yet they don't offer better font licenses. I don't understand why they don't make it simple single license term for all usecases and make a sale. It's masochistic.
Regardless, the purpose of a logo is to discern and identify amongst thousands of other similar looking logos. I lean towards Logomarks (Nike, Apple, Starbucks) and less towards (Stripe, CocaCola, Kellogs).
I recommend getting a logomark + logotype designed by a professional graphics designer.
Tolerance and forgiveness is a value we need embrace. You should ask yourself if anyone at IBM today supports the holocaust.
I urge you to watch news channels from the 80s. Literally every TV media was degraded from Discovery channel to History channel.
There are experts that can verify Picasso. Digital assets are copied verbatim with 100% fidelity and zero error.
contract ERC721 {
// ERC20 compatible functions
function name() constant returns (string name);
function symbol() constant returns (string symbol);
function totalSupply() constant returns (uint256 totalSupply);
function balanceOf(address _owner) constant returns (uint balance);
// Functions that define ownership
function ownerOf(uint256 _tokenId) constant returns (address owner);
function approve(address _to, uint256 _tokenId);
function takeOwnership(uint256 _tokenId);
function transfer(address _to, uint256 _tokenId);
function tokenOfOwnerByIndex(address _owner, uint256 _index) constant returns (uint tokenId);
// Token metadata
function tokenMetadata(uint256 _tokenId) constant returns (string infoUrl);
// Events
event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _tokenId);
event Approval(address indexed _owner, address indexed _approved, uint256 _tokenId);
}
It's not hard to understand. This ERC721 NFT token can verify is its owner (ownerOf()), and the actual item of interest (tokenMetaData()). Item of interest is secured either on the blockchain itself or offline using URL reference in the metadata.All good. But that's all she wrote. Banksy can list his digital artwork on the internet and many people can bid on it. That is actually valuable if you think about it in isolation. The problem is on the auction side, with decentralized bidding - you have no idea if this artwork was pumped up by fake buyers. There is no Sotheby's or Christie's auction house to mediate this.
URL metadata is also weird - now you're passing on the value of the token to whoever owns the Domain Name and the servers responding to the GET request. If the artist decides to sell or forgets to renew the domain name, your NFT is useless unless the data was backed up somewhere. Even then, the next buyer of the NFT would want to access the URL and get their goodies instead of getting it from anywhere else since that's not on the tokenMetadata.
[1] Source: https://medium.com/crypto-currently/the-anatomy-of-erc721-e9...
Now a days, shipping to me evokes “Fuck it, ship this shitty MVP to customers because ship ship ship” and then they wonder “Gee, why didn’t my app take off?”.
I understand the need to ship, but I never see anyone daring to challenge the frantic broken shitty app philosophy and maybe wondering if they built them with care, maybe... just maybe customers with actually come? Has anyone tried to go against the grain since the SEGA days? It’s high risk.
Thanks for a great perspective.
Does anyone feel the same? If someone told me "I sold stuff, therefore I am", it just leaves a bad impression of them for me.
Build stuff with care and craftsmanship. Strive for excellence, take pride in your work and deliver, not ship.
Hey, wasn't that the original intent of HTML+CSS? To isolate markup and design?
People are allured by the rapid prototyping aspects of Tailwind which is the main bait. It's pretty fast to see results immediately without openining the css file.
Have you studied MATLAB and its ecosystem? It ranges from real time control to image recognition to sophisticated engineering-specific toolboxes (RF, 5G, LTE, etc.). They also have proprietary algorithms that do things no Julia package can do. Sure, there is PDE solvers and the ecosystem is growing for Julia, but it is at-least an order of magnitude smaller than MATLAB if not more. I urge you to explore the documentation, APIs and toolbox details on MATLAB: https://www.mathworks.com/products.html
Take a look at the LIDAR toolbox for example: https://www.mathworks.com/products/lidar.html
or LTE: https://www.mathworks.com/products/lte.html
and I've used DSP toolbox the most: https://www.mathworks.com/products/dsp-system.html
I am not condoning use of MATLAB, just stating the facts having used Julia and MATLAB extensively. I personally like Julia language FWIW. At work, we use MATLAB and happily pay for it. Their support is absolutely top-notch and for us it is the reason alone to use MATLAB. Julia has support but not even close to MATLAB's direct line to compiler engineers (yes, I've had them fix a bug and do a release in an afternoon).
Person's baldness was given to them at birth. They had no say in it just like the pigmentation color. What's the objective difference?
CO2 impact for stuff like this - we probably have bigger fish to fry.
- Outside media continues to refer to her as Timnit including NYTimes which affects HN users
- If someone’s name is Gorot Trzebiatowski (please forgive me if you have such a name), most people would go with Gorot because it is shorter and easier to pronounce / write. Subconsciously, these things happen.
You’re right - No need to assume malice where probably there isn’t. This is conspiratorial thinking - find some pattern of data that supports mainstream narrative and make conclusions from it. This is what QAnon conspirators do all day.
Although I’m curious about your motivation for analyzing this :-)
What a fucked up world we live in.
Since media cannot cover thousands of individual cases, there should be legal avenues without deep pockets for lawyer fees to sue companies for racist behavior.
The court should look at this situation objectively and factually.