matkoniecz

In am not getting why this would be the name of such claim

maybe I am not elite and rich or infirm enough - but I do not get why I would pay extra for doorman or similar servants.

why?

given "Airline tickets were more expensive"

(observed error rate for me is much much much lower than 1/10)

thanks! It turns out that I am apparently qualifying for it and I was unaware

lets see whether Anthropic agrees

for example something mapped as a node may be remapped as an area (closed way)

In such situation own supply of power is much more valuable.

And I bet that it was not government run build-out, unless you count failing to have consistently working power grid.

is it intentional hyperbole and you mean something else, or are you making exactly this kind of claim?

because there are many many caveats to add here (even if we go with plan that specifically governments should be doing it)

For start: land with legitimate environmental protection, land where connecting power would be ruinously expensive, area likely to be destroyed by floods and landslides or scheduled to be overbuilt and so on...

some groups offer it (not out of goodness: rather on price discrimination grounds)

please test it properly before putting it in production, communism went poorly

> Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.

note that I am not arguing that better system is impossible - that would be silly

but "destroy capitalism" attempts went remarkably badly so far

well, other systems were tried and were worse (feudalism, communism etc)

in practice capitalism with some regulations is better than known alternatives

> Contributing to open source software or commons like Wikipedia definitely is questionable

what is not questionable then?

but worse than no contributions at all

> we'll just have to converge on the idea that quality is what matters.

for me it is not changed at all, just that volume of spam increased and it is now harder to detect

which GPU?

also, so, 90 months of my subscription? And I also would need to buy new RAM and other parts of a computer?

(You are not required to agree for such use in tos, but it will be used anyway)

(Not by Codeberg operators, to be clear)

Also, it is not likely to happen any time soon.

We have less rich gamers deciding to not upgrade their PCs at most.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50400515 for longer comment on that

And "if all current AI users" is a strawman, people using free chatgpt once or twice a day are not going to buy RAM to run own LLMs.

1) boom and bust cycle in memory industry is a repeated problem

2) companies are not obligated to scale up

> and is being taken out of context

no it is not - Altman is lying by omission[0] by implicating that various important costs are not real

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50400515 for longer comment on that

it should not, in my opinion

if you assume crazy fairy land that is not going to happen, then you can assume cheap and plentiful RAM for better results

no, he was lying by omission

"it's quite terrible" only if you ignore all the problems with plans they promote and measure it only in metrics Altman wants to measure, as they support his plans

For start, Altman would charge as much as possible to optimize profits, so very significant part of efficiency increase would become profits of "Open"AI.

As another obvious problem: handing so much power to a specific company has own costs.

There are so many problems here with this specific part - starting from their power dictating how can you use it, access to your data. And that part is getting worse for anyone not planning to obey all decisions coming from USA. We have already seen export controls being invoked.

But wider, if you think that outsourcing thinking to a specific SaaS has no costs, beyond current subscription costs, then I have several thousands of bridges for sale.

Overall it would go through weekly usage within 40 minutes, if not for 5h session limit.

Running on 10000 computers will just hit all the limits at once.