Done!
336 karma · joined November 15, 2016
This is just a list of (mostly) ill-informed questions rather than "Thought-Provoking Climate Change 2.0 Ideas", and certainly don't answer acabal's question, or the address title of the post.
That just seems wrong.
"For example" would be "e.g.", ("exempli gratia" in Latin.)
"E.g." is illustrative, whereas "i.e." is exhaustive.
I hadn't heard "i.e." expanded to "in example" before - that explains one source of misunderstanding (despite being grammatically incorrect in its own right).
Edit: It seems you've since been unfairly downvoted for explaining what you meant. Please folks, don't do that. I asked the question, and @fraserharris answered honestly.
Why have Burger King in particular had this problem?
Outside research? Do you genuinely believe they consulted the spirit world?
At most this this would surface their collective belief in the guilt of the accused. An unconventional means to arrive at a consensus, but no more outside research than each of them writing a verdict on a piece of paper.
Outside research? Do you genuinely believe they consulted the the spirit world?
At most this this would surface their collective belief in the guilt of the accused. An unconventional means to arrive at a consensus, but no more outside research than each of them writing a verdict on a piece of paper.
Thanks for clarifying the data model & serializers.
1) Can this be used as as content-editable substitute? 2) What format is the marked-up text stored in, and does it require Slate to be rendered?
Then you should probably say "we are" rather than "they are" so that it's clear from the outset. (PS. When you disclose something, it's a "disclosure".)
Here's a rundown: https://blog.bluetooth.com/developing-applications-bbc-micro...
My child's DT teacher did, but they used it for one lesson, then were given it to bring home. It's now in a drawer somewhere.
That was last year. I haven't heard of any plans to repeat the exercise.
people from other countries might enter it correctly without thinking about it
Or they could align their charges to their costs, and have the users pay for the service.
I did look at the docs, but that doesn't have an explanation of what value this is trying to offer either.
If designers are being asked to write CSS-IN-JS, I can get where there the difficulty comes from, but I'd still argue that most of these functions are just moving the chairs around.
This [1] IMHO is the defacto JS color lib, but again can see how, if the only thing you know is SASS, it looks a bit to much like real code.
That isn't what this is although I also had to poke around the source code to figure out what it is exactly.
It's a set of mixins and utility functions that return a js object that is then used as input for either inline styles, or for one of the may CSS in JS libraries that convert do a JS object to CSS.
As for how useful? Well, the color utilities seem to replicate what color.js does, so nothing new there. The mixins seem to be mostly about prefixing, and you're going to need to prefix the rest of your CSS-in-JS anyway - for which there are various standalone libraries, and plugins to the aforementioned libraries.
The shorthands let you do things like:
borderWidth('12px', '24px', '36px', '48px')
=>
{ 'border-top-width': '12px', 'border-right-width': '24px', 'border-bottom-width': '36px', 'border-left-width': '48px' }
Thing is, I can already do that without the expansion:
{ 'borderWidth': '12px 24px 36px 48px' }
As much as I respect the guys behind this, I'd question how useful it is overall.
So you never know - but how would that work inside a metal coin?
The time you spend on the course, and the time spent by your instance running workloads are two completely separate things.
Your cost per-hour is accurate (plus a few bucks for an IP address), but the number of hours is off by an order of magnitude.
Also, I'm paying double that per instance per month for SSD using the provided scripts to build the instances. It's the smallest part of the cost, but I mention it because it can take newcomers to EC2 by surprise if they have an instance shut-down but consuming disk space.