336 karma · joined November 15, 2016
[1] https://www.cyclist.co.uk/in-depth/1365/is-it-safer-to-wear-...
"A small portion of the hypogea was opened to the public in 2016."
I've visited twice, and on the more recent occasion we found one of the few tours that offered this as part of the tour.
Perhaps a mini meet-up is in order? :)
His format is great, and he can certainly break it down well, but the content needs more variety.
So, if it is possible to correlate the personal data with other records that identify an individual (whether by you or a third party with whom the data is shared) it is personal data.
Full disclosure: I work for Veritas Technologies, which, among many other things, provides technologies that help companies find, filter and take action on PII and personal data. Opinions shared here are my own, and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer.
[1] https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protectio...
Here's one example: http://xkcdgraphs.com/ (there are plenty of others if you search for them).
Consider yourself fortunate that they were covered at all. In some schools those are taboo subjects, as they conflict with the religious ethos.
The thread that this comment[1] is in is where it all starts, but the repo and presentation linked from that comment should give the answers. At least as a snapshot at that point in time).
[1]https://github.com/mui-org/material-ui/issues/4066#issuecomm...
Material-UI has been designed with customisability in mind, so you can get the functionality of the components without necessarily having to look like Material Design.
On a home computer. In the 80's to early 90's. The future is where you have been.
If your tool has broader application than PII, you might want to rethink the name. If it doesn't, you might want to rethink your target market.
I agree that the response is varied.
Disclosure: My employer sells tools for unstrctured data discovery and classification.
Data insight is targeted at more user oriented unstructured content repositories (CIFS, NFS, SharePoint, OneDrive, SharePoint Online, Box), but the fundamentals are very similar: content classifiaction, data profiling, risk scoring, access pattern anomaly detection, access control remediation.
[0] https://www.veritas.com/product/information-governance/data-...
They are not risking a fall with some possibility of death (or perhaps just a grazed knee), they are risking certain death. You fall, you die.
I have no idea what George Carlin's rant against the term "self-help" has to do with this, but it was pretty funny. So, thanks?
I tried pasting the relevant parts from the a raw bot file, but it wouldn't run.
Also, having developed and simulated, how would one use the resulting bot in production?
Compare 0.x (before): https://github.com/callemall/material-ui/blob/master/README....
With v1-beta (after): 1.0-beta: https://github.com/callemall/material-ui/blob/v1-beta/README...
If you're providing a storage service to a business that handles personal data, your a data processor, not a data controller.
If you're the data controller, you need a classification technology that can identify personal data in those documents (amongst other capabilities).
As always, there are exceptions, but that's the general rule.
If it contains personal data on an EU natural person regardless of where the company is based is based, or on any natural person anywhere if the company is EU based, it is subject to the GDPR.
To be clear, this article is about the American Red Cross (which is not to say that other branches and other NGOs aren't as bad), but if you want to know what your donation is going to support... good luck!
"Who does the GDPR affect? The GDPR not only applies to organisations located within the EU but it will also apply to organisations located outside of the EU if they offer goods or services to, or monitor the behaviour of, EU data subjects. It applies to all companies processing and holding the personal data of data subjects residing in the European Union, regardless of the company’s location."
http://www.eugdpr.org/gdpr-faqs.html
The first point is covered in article 14:
"The protection afforded by this Regulation should apply to natural persons, whatever their nationality or place of residence, in relation to the processing of their personal data."
The second in article 23:
"In order to ensure that natural persons are not deprived of the protection to which they are entitled under this Regulation, the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or a processor not established in the Union should be subject to this Regulation where the processing activities are related to offering goods or services to such data subjects irrespective of whether connected to a payment."
http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5419-2016-IN...
You also won't be able to keep backups of this data longer than is necessary for operational restore purposes (more on that below).
The rule is that you shouldn’t keep personal data for longer than is necessary for the purpose for which it was collected.
There are five exceptions to this, one of which is:
2) for compliance with a legal obligation which requires processing by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject or for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller.
This addresses the need to meet other regulatory requirements that you mentioned.
You'll need to keep a metadata record of what you have deleted.
In the event that you have to restore data from a backup for operational purposes, you need to cross reference it to the record of deletions that occurred since the backup was created to ensure that any such data is either not restored, or is immediately deleted again.
This is only a fraction of an organization's obligations under GDPR, being those most directly relevant to your question.
Disclosure: I work for a company that provide solutions in this space.