336 karma · joined November 15, 2016
Edit: To be clear, I'm not suggesting it's not worth it, just highlighting that theres's more than a time commitment to budget for.
You can read the HN discussion here [2], since this appeared on the front page a week ago, much to my surprise [3].
[1]1 http://ljjensen.net/Maritimt/A%20Review%20of%20Modern%20Sail...
"clinical:meteor is an open-source project creating a next-gen framework for building healthcare apps".
You could:
1) Have the QR code contain a real URL, with the Expo ID appended as a querystring.
3) On the server, redirect to the appropriate app-store depending on the browser used to open the URL, or open sketch if installed.
3) Have Expo interpret the querystring to open the correct "sketch".
For the record though, since it seems important to you - there was no "heavy downvoting". Even if there had been, please consider that you don't speak for HN, and couldn't possibly know the motivation.
As a lay-person I've come to expect convoluted legalese as found in contract terms, but where those are typically designed to bamboozle and obfuscate, or at least keep corporate lawyers employed decoding and negotiating each others writing, judgements and rulings are designed with the opposite goal in mind. If you are potentially creating case-law, it better be clear what you have decided and why.
[1] http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/13-...
The copyright notice only serves (informally) to indicate the start-point for this time.
If you need a tool to help, take a look at the google image search for "lonely planet". Their image matching algorithm thinks planet's logo is related to lonely planet's.
There was an article on HN yesterday [1] in which one of the replies to the top comment about AG Bell's attempts at flight said: "The difference is that Bell didn't understand aerodynamics and didn't seem to do a thing about it."
That reminded me about an article I'd read some time back that suggested that even modern aviation experts don't correctly understand lift.
Today, that article is on the front page of HN.
So demonstrating that you didn't even read the article.
It's not due until June 2017 (how long does it take to fit a roofbox to a car?!) and then then only for pretend use in a training facility.
It's also clear from the video that the GUI is an artists impression.
Like I said "because marketing".
Second, why a quad-copter? Anyone that knows anything about multirotors knows that a quad-coptor has multiple single points of failure, where a hex or octo can be controlled with single or multiple failures respectively.
Seems like they just slapped a hobby drone on the roof of a car "because marketing". It doesn't deserve to be on HN.
Judge Pregerson to the appellate lawyer, Daniel J. Voelker made me laugh (30:25):
"They abused our court system for illegal purposes, to extort money. [...] This has got to be written about for years and years - you're probably going to be part of the story."
Compared to Voelker, Morgan E. Pietz (beginning 35:30) for the appellee does a superb job of keeping discussions on point when faced with similar anecdotes and trivia questions.
Having (unintentionally) watched the whole video I was curious what the decision was, whether Prenda had their day in (criminal contempt) court, but as it transpires the appeal was dismissed: http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/13-...
Curiously, as good a job as Pietz may have done making his case, it doesn't appear that when reaching their conclusion, the panel depended on much (if any) of the case law he cited.
We all speak (and behave) differently when we are with our parents, our colleagues and our friends - and arguably online, even when speaking in our native tongue in all these (and other) scenarios.
That is not to say that certain languages don't lend themselves better to certain forms of expression, but I'm not convinced your anecdotes support that argument.
Adobe has already developed that technology:
https://arstechnica.co.uk/information-technology/2016/11/ado...
Now imagine combining it with this:
Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk
Perhaps using the intonation from the face-actor's voice to guide the speech synthesis.
Glad to see I can get rid if it (in Chrome at least).
It's stated as benefit, but is this the reason pilots get bored perhaps?
* Select the images containing a street sign
* Select the squares in an image containing a street sign
* Draw a polygon around the sign
Someone better informed than me might be able to comment on how that fits in to deep learning strategies.